Lemma 108.11.1. Let $A$ be a ring and let $I \subset A$ be an ideal. The category $\mathcal{C}$ of derived complete modules is abelian and the inclusion functor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \text{Mod}_ A$ is exact and commutes with arbitrary limits. If $I$ is finitely generated, then $\mathcal{C}$ has arbitrary direct sums and colimits, but $F$ does not commute with these in general. Finally, filtered colimits are not exact in $\mathcal{C}$ in general, hence $\mathcal{C}$ is not a Grothendieck abelian category.

## 108.11 The category of derived complete modules

Let $A$ be a ring and let $I$ be an ideal. Consider the category $\mathcal{C}$ of derived complete modules as defined in More on Algebra, Definition 15.86.4. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.86.6 we see that $\mathcal{C}$ is abelian.

Let $T$ be a set and let $M_ t$, $t \in T$ be a family of derived complete modules. We claim that in general $\bigoplus M_ t$ is not a complete module. For a specific example, let $A = \mathbf{Z}_ p$ and $I = (p)$ and $\bigoplus _{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathbf{Z}_ p$. The map from $\bigoplus _{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathbf{Z}_ p$ to its $p$-adic completion isn't surjective. This means that $\bigoplus _{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathbf{Z}_ p$ cannot be derived complete as this would imply otherwise, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.86.3.

Assume $I$ is finitely generated. Let ${}^\wedge : D(A) \to D(A)$ denote the **derived completion** functor, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.86.10. We claim that

is a direct sum of $M_ t$ in the category $\mathcal{C}$. Note that for $E$ a derived complete object of $D(A)$ we have

Note that the right hand side is zero if $H^ i(E) = 0$ for $i < 1$. In particular, applying this with $E = \tau _{\geq 1} (\bigoplus M_ t)^\wedge $ which is derived complete by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.86.6 we see that the canonical map $(\bigoplus M_ t)^\wedge \to \tau _{\geq 1}(\bigoplus M_ t)^\wedge $ is zero, in other words, we have $H^ i((\bigoplus M_ t)^\wedge ) = 0$ for $i \geq 1$. Then, for an object $N \in \mathcal{C}$ we see that

as desired. This implies that $\mathcal{C}$ has all colimits, see Categories, Lemma 4.14.12. In fact, arguing similarly as above we see that given a system $M_ t$ in $\mathcal{C}$ over a preordered set $T$ the colimit in $\mathcal{C}$ is equal to $H^0((\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M_ t)^\wedge )$ where the inner colimit is the colimit in the category of $A$-modules.

However, we claim that filtered colimits are not exact in the category $\mathcal{C}$. Namely, suppose that $A = \mathbf{Z}_ p$ and $I = (p)$. One has inclusions $f_ n : \mathbf{Z}_ p/p\mathbf{Z}_ p \to \mathbf{Z}_ p/p^ n\mathbf{Z}_ p$ of $p$-adically complete $A$-modules given by multiplication by $p^{n - 1}$. There are commutative diagrams

Now take the colimit of these inclusions in the category $\mathcal{C}$ derived to get $\mathbf{Z}_ p/p\mathbf{Z}_ p \to 0$. Namely, the colimit in $\text{Mod}_ A$ of the system on the right is $\mathbf{Q}_ p/\mathbf{Z}_ p$. The reader can directly compute that $(\mathbf{Q}_ p/\mathbf{Z}_ p)^\wedge = \mathbf{Z}_ p[1]$ in $D(A)$. Thus $H^0 = 0$ which proves our claim.

**Proof.**
See discussion above.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)