The Stacks project

110.10 The category of complete modules is not abelian

Let $R$ be a ring and let $I \subset R$ be a finitely generated ideal. Consider the category $\mathcal{A}$ of $I$-adically complete $R$-modules, see Algebra, Definition 10.96.2. Let $\varphi : M \to N$ be a morphism of $\mathcal{A}$. The cokernel of $\varphi $ in $\mathcal{A}$ is the $I$-adic completion $(\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\varphi ))^\wedge $ of the usual cokernel (as $I$ is finitely generated this completion is complete, see Algebra, Lemma 10.96.3). Let $K = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi )$; since $\varphi $ is continuous this is a closed submodule of $M$. By Lemma 110.10.1 below we see that $K$ is $I$-adically complete and hence is the kernel of $\varphi $ in $\mathcal{A}$.

Lemma 110.10.1. Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal of a ring. Let $M$ be an $I$-adically complete $R$-module and let $N \subset M$ be a submodule. The following are equivalent

  1. $N$ is closed in $M$,

  2. $N = \bigcap _{n \geq 1} (N + I^ n M)$,

  3. $M/N$ is $I$-adically complete

If $I$ is finitely generated, these conditions imply that $N$ is $I$-adically complete.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from Formal Spaces, Lemma 87.4.2. The equivalence of (2) and (3) is Algebra, Lemma 10.96.10. Assume $I$ is finitely generated and (1) holds. Let $N^\wedge $ be the $I$-adic completion of $N$. Since $M$ is $I$-adically complete we have a factorization

\[ N \to N^\wedge \to M \]

of the inclusion map. Since $N^\wedge \to M$ is continuous and $N$ is dense in $N^\wedge $ and $N$ is closed in $M$, we see that $N^\wedge \to M$ factors through $N$. Thus $N^\wedge = N \oplus C$ for some $A$-module $C$. Thus $N$ is a direct summand of the $I$-adically complete module $N^\wedge $, see Algebra, Lemma 10.96.3 (this is where we use that $I$ is finitely generated), and hence $N$ is $I$-adically complete. $\square$

We will give an example that shows that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\not= \mathop{\mathrm{Coim}}$ in the category $\mathcal{A}$ in general. We take $R = \mathbf{Z}_ p = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n \mathbf{Z}/p^ n\mathbf{Z}$ to be the ring of $p$-adic integers and we take $I = (p)$. Consider the map

\[ \text{diag}(1, p, p^2, \ldots ) : \left(\bigoplus \nolimits _{n \geq 1} \mathbf{Z}_ p\right)^\wedge \longrightarrow \prod \nolimits _{n \geq 1} \mathbf{Z}_ p \]

where the left hand side is the $p$-adic completion of the direct sum. Hence an element of the left hand side is a vector $(x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots )$ with $x_ i \in \mathbf{Z}_ p$ with $p$-adic valuation $v_ p(x_ i) \to \infty $ as $i \to \infty $. This maps to $(x_1, px_2, p^2x_3, \ldots )$. Hence we see that $(1, p, p^2, \ldots )$ is in the closure of the image but not in the image. By our description of kernels and cokernels above it is clear that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\not= \mathop{\mathrm{Coim}}$ for this map.

Lemma 110.10.2. Let $R$ be a ring and let $I \subset R$ be a finitely generated ideal. The category of $I$-adically complete $R$-modules has kernels and cokernels but is not abelian in general even when $R$ is Noetherian.

Proof. See above. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #10809 by KD on

It might make sense to include a lemma to indicate what set of hypotheses might ensure that the category of -adically complete -modules will be abelian. It's probably almost never the case, but surely there's some nice set of comditions for it.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07JQ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.