Lemma 15.123.6. Let A be a valuation ring. Let A^ h, resp. A^{sh} be its henselization, resp. strict henselization. Then
are extensions of valuation rings which induce bijections on value groups, i.e., which are weakly unramified.
Lemma 15.123.6. Let A be a valuation ring. Let A^ h, resp. A^{sh} be its henselization, resp. strict henselization. Then
are extensions of valuation rings which induce bijections on value groups, i.e., which are weakly unramified.
Proof. Write A^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits (B_ i)_{\mathfrak q_ i} where A \to B_ i is étale and \mathfrak q_ i \subset B_ i is a prime ideal lying over \mathfrak m_ A, see Algebra, Lemma 10.155.7. Then Lemma 15.123.5 tells us that (B_ i)_{\mathfrak q_ i} is a valuation ring and that the induced map
is bijective. By Algebra, Lemma 10.50.6 we conclude that A^ h is a valuation ring. It also follows that (A \setminus \{ 0\} )/A^* \to (A^ h \setminus \{ 0\} )/(A^ h)^* is bijective. This proves the lemma for the inclusion A \subset A^ h. To prove it for A \subset A^{sh} we can use exactly the same argument except we replace Algebra, Lemma 10.155.7 by Algebra, Lemma 10.155.11. Since A^{sh} = (A^ h)^{sh} we see that this also proves the assertions of the lemma for the inclusion A^ h \subset A^{sh}. \square
Comments (0)