Lemma 10.155.11. Let R be a ring. Let \mathfrak p \subset R be a prime ideal. Let \kappa (\mathfrak p) \subset \kappa ^{sep} be a separable algebraic closure. Consider the category of triples (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) where R \to S is étale, \mathfrak q is a prime lying over \mathfrak p, and \phi : \kappa (\mathfrak q) \to \kappa ^{sep} is a \kappa (\mathfrak p)-algebra map. This category is filtered and
(R_{\mathfrak p})^{sh} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(S, \mathfrak q, \phi )} S = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(S, \mathfrak q, \phi )} S_{\mathfrak q}
canonically.
Proof.
A morphism of triples (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) \to (S', \mathfrak q', \phi ') is given by an R-algebra map \varphi : S \to S' such that \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q') = \mathfrak q and such that \phi ' \circ \varphi = \phi . Let us show that the category of pairs is filtered, see Categories, Definition 4.19.1. The category contains the triple (R, \mathfrak p, \kappa (\mathfrak p) \subset \kappa ^{sep}) and hence is not empty, which proves part (1) of Categories, Definition 4.19.1. Suppose that (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) and (S', \mathfrak q', \phi ') are two triples. Note that \mathfrak q, resp. \mathfrak q' correspond to primes of the fibre rings S \otimes \kappa (\mathfrak p), resp. S' \otimes \kappa (\mathfrak p) with residue fields finite separable over \kappa (\mathfrak p) and \phi , resp. \phi ' correspond to maps into \kappa ^{sep}. Hence this data corresponds to \kappa (\mathfrak p)-algebra maps
\phi : S \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p) \longrightarrow \kappa ^{sep}, \quad \phi ' : S' \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p) \longrightarrow \kappa ^{sep}.
Set S'' = S \otimes _ R S'. Combining the maps the above we get a unique \kappa (\mathfrak p)-algebra map
\phi '' = \phi \otimes \phi ' : S'' \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p) \longrightarrow \kappa ^{sep}
whose kernel corresponds to a prime \mathfrak q'' \subset S'' lying over \mathfrak q and over \mathfrak q', and whose residue field maps via \phi '' to the compositum of \phi (\kappa (\mathfrak q)) and \phi '(\kappa (\mathfrak q')) in \kappa ^{sep}. The ring map R \to S'' is étale by Lemma 10.143.3. Hence (S'', \mathfrak q'', \phi '') is a triple dominating both (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) and (S', \mathfrak q', \phi '). This proves part (2) of Categories, Definition 4.19.1. Next, suppose that \varphi , \psi : (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) \to (S', \mathfrak q', \phi ') are two morphisms of pairs. Then \varphi , \psi , and S' \otimes _ R S' \to S' are étale ring maps by Lemma 10.143.8. Consider
S'' = (S' \otimes _{\varphi , S, \psi } S') \otimes _{S' \otimes _ R S'} S'
Arguing as above (base change of étale maps is étale, composition of étale maps is étale) we see that S'' is étale over R. The fibre ring of S'' over \mathfrak p is
F'' = (F' \otimes _{\varphi , F, \psi } F') \otimes _{F' \otimes _{\kappa (\mathfrak p)} F'} F'
where F', F are the fibre rings of S' and S. Since \varphi and \psi are morphisms of triples the map \phi ' : F' \to \kappa ^{sep} extends to a map \phi '' : F'' \to \kappa ^{sep} which in turn corresponds to a prime ideal \mathfrak q'' \subset S''. The canonical map S' \to S'' (using the right most factor for example) is a morphism of triples (S', \mathfrak q', \phi ') \to (S'', \mathfrak q'', \phi '') which equalizes \varphi and \psi . This proves part (3) of Categories, Definition 4.19.1. Hence we conclude that the category is filtered.
We still have to show that the colimit R_{colim} of the system is equal to the strict henselization of R_{\mathfrak p} with respect to \kappa ^{sep}. To see this note that the system of triples (S, \mathfrak q, \phi ) contains as a subsystem the pairs (S, \mathfrak q) of Lemma 10.155.7. Hence R_{colim} contains R_{\mathfrak p}^ h by the result of that lemma. Moreover, it is clear that R_{\mathfrak p}^ h \subset R_{colim} is a directed colimit of étale ring extensions. It follows that R_{colim} is henselian by Lemmas 10.153.4 and 10.154.8. Finally, by Lemma 10.144.3 we see that the residue field of R_{colim} is equal to \kappa ^{sep}. Hence we conclude that R_{colim} is strictly henselian and hence equals the strict henselization of R_{\mathfrak p} as desired. Some details omitted.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: