Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

43.22 Projection formula for flat proper morphisms

Short discussion of the projection formula for flat proper morphisms.

Lemma 43.22.1.reference Let f : X \to Y be a flat proper morphism of nonsingular varieties. Set e = \dim (X) - \dim (Y). Let \alpha be an r-cycle on X and let \beta be a s-cycle on Y. Assume that \alpha and f^*(\beta ) intersect properly. Then f_*(\alpha ) and \beta intersect properly and

f_*(\alpha ) \cdot \beta = f_*( \alpha \cdot f^*\beta )

Proof. By linearity we reduce to the case where \alpha = [V] and \beta = [W] for some closed subvariety V \subset X and W \subset Y of dimension r and s. Then f^{-1}(W) has pure dimension s + e. We assume the cycles [V] and f^*[W] intersect properly. We will use without further mention the fact that V \cap f^{-1}(W) \to f(V) \cap W is surjective.

Let a be the dimension of the generic fibre of V \to f(V). If a > 0, then f_*[V] = 0. In particular f_*\alpha and \beta intersect properly. To finish this case we have to show that f_*([V] \cdot f^*[W]) = 0. However, since every fibre of V \to f(V) has dimension \geq a (see Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.4) we conclude that every irreducible component Z of V \cap f^{-1}(W) has fibres of dimension \geq a over f(Z). This certainly implies what we want.

Assume that V \to f(V) is generically finite. Let Z \subset f(V) \cap W be an irreducible component. Let Z_ i \subset V \cap f^{-1}(W), i = 1, \ldots , t be the irreducible components of V \cap f^{-1}(W) dominating Z. By assumption each Z_ i has dimension r + s + e - \dim (X) = r + s - \dim (Y). Hence \dim (Z) \leq r + s - \dim (Y). Thus we see that f(V) and W intersect properly, \dim (Z) = r + s - \dim (Y), and each Z_ i \to Z is generically finite. In particular, it follows that V \to f(V) has finite fibre over the generic point \xi of Z. Thus V \to Y is finite in an open neighbourhood of \xi , see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.21.2. Using a very general projection formula for derived tensor products, we get

Rf_*(\mathcal{O}_ V \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} Lf^*\mathcal{O}_ W) = Rf_*\mathcal{O}_ V \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y}^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}_ W

see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.22.1. Since f is flat, we see that Lf^*\mathcal{O}_ W = f^*\mathcal{O}_ W. Since f|_ V is finite in an open neighbourhood of \xi we have

(Rf_*\mathcal{F})_\xi = (f_*\mathcal{F})_\xi

for any coherent sheaf on X whose support is contained in V (see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.20.8). Thus we conclude that

43.22.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{intersection-equation-stalks} \left( f_*\text{Tor}_ i^{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{O}_ V, f^*\mathcal{O}_ W) \right)_\xi = \left(\text{Tor}_ i^{\mathcal{O}_ Y}(f_*\mathcal{O}_ V, \mathcal{O}_ W)\right)_\xi \end{equation}

for all i. Since f^*[W] = [f^*\mathcal{O}_ W]_{s + e} by Lemma 43.7.1 we have

[V] \cdot f^*[W] = \sum (-1)^ i [\text{Tor}_ i^{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{O}_ V, f^*\mathcal{O}_ W)]_{r + s - \dim (Y)}

by Lemma 43.19.4. Applying Lemma 43.6.1 we find

f_*([V] \cdot f^*[W]) = \sum (-1)^ i [f_*\text{Tor}_ i^{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{O}_ V, f^*\mathcal{O}_ W)]_{r + s - \dim (Y)}

Since f_*[V] = [f_*\mathcal{O}_ V]_ r by Lemma 43.6.1 we have

[f_*V] \cdot [W] = \sum (-1)^ i [\text{Tor}_ i^{\mathcal{O}_ X}(f_*\mathcal{O}_ V, \mathcal{O}_ W)]_{r + s - \dim (Y)}

again by Lemma 43.19.4. Comparing the formula for f_*([V] \cdot f^*[W]) with the formula for f_*[V] \cdot [W] and looking at the coefficient of Z by taking lengths of stalks at \xi , we see that (43.22.1.1) finishes the proof. \square

Lemma 43.22.2. Let X \to P be a closed immersion of nonsingular varieties. Let C' \subset P \times \mathbf{P}^1 be a closed subvariety of dimension r + 1. Assume

  1. the fibre C = C'_0 has dimension r, i.e., C' \to \mathbf{P}^1 is dominant,

  2. C' intersects X \times \mathbf{P}^1 properly,

  3. [C]_ r intersects X properly.

Then setting \alpha = [C]_ r \cdot X viewed as cycle on X and \beta = C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 viewed as cycle on X \times \mathbf{P}^1, we have

\alpha = \text{pr}_{X, *}(\beta \cdot X \times 0)

as cycles on X where \text{pr}_ X : X \times \mathbf{P}^1 \to X is the projection.

Proof. Let \text{pr} : P \times \mathbf{P}^1 \to P be the projection. Since we are proving an equality of cycles it suffices to think of \alpha , resp. \beta as a cycle on P, resp. P \times \mathbf{P}^1 and prove the result for pushing forward by \text{pr}. Because \text{pr}^*X = X \times \mathbf{P}^1 and \text{pr} defines an isomorphism of C'_0 onto C the projection formula (Lemma 43.22.1) gives

\text{pr}_*([C'_0]_ r \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1) = [C]_ r \cdot X = \alpha

On the other hand, we have [C'_0]_ r = C' \cdot P \times 0 as cycles on P \times \mathbf{P}^1 by Lemma 43.17.1. Hence

[C'_0]_ r \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 = (C' \cdot P \times 0) \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 = (C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1) \cdot P \times 0

by associativity (Lemma 43.20.1) and commutativity of the intersection product. It remains to show that the intersection product of C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 with P \times 0 on P \times \mathbf{P}^1 is equal (as a cycle) to the intersection product of \beta with X \times 0 on X \times \mathbf{P}^1. Write C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 = \sum n_ k[E_ k] and hence \beta = \sum n_ k[E_ k] for some subvarieties E_ k \subset X \times \mathbf{P}^1 \subset P \times \mathbf{P}^1. Then both intersections are equal to \sum m_ k[E_{k, 0}] by Lemma 43.17.1 applied twice. This finishes the proof. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.