Lemma 43.22.1.reference Let f : X \to Y be a flat proper morphism of nonsingular varieties. Set e = \dim (X) - \dim (Y). Let \alpha be an r-cycle on X and let \beta be a s-cycle on Y. Assume that \alpha and f^*(\beta ) intersect properly. Then f_*(\alpha ) and \beta intersect properly and
43.22 Projection formula for flat proper morphisms
Short discussion of the projection formula for flat proper morphisms.
Proof. By linearity we reduce to the case where \alpha = [V] and \beta = [W] for some closed subvariety V \subset X and W \subset Y of dimension r and s. Then f^{-1}(W) has pure dimension s + e. We assume the cycles [V] and f^*[W] intersect properly. We will use without further mention the fact that V \cap f^{-1}(W) \to f(V) \cap W is surjective.
Let a be the dimension of the generic fibre of V \to f(V). If a > 0, then f_*[V] = 0. In particular f_*\alpha and \beta intersect properly. To finish this case we have to show that f_*([V] \cdot f^*[W]) = 0. However, since every fibre of V \to f(V) has dimension \geq a (see Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.4) we conclude that every irreducible component Z of V \cap f^{-1}(W) has fibres of dimension \geq a over f(Z). This certainly implies what we want.
Assume that V \to f(V) is generically finite. Let Z \subset f(V) \cap W be an irreducible component. Let Z_ i \subset V \cap f^{-1}(W), i = 1, \ldots , t be the irreducible components of V \cap f^{-1}(W) dominating Z. By assumption each Z_ i has dimension r + s + e - \dim (X) = r + s - \dim (Y). Hence \dim (Z) \leq r + s - \dim (Y). Thus we see that f(V) and W intersect properly, \dim (Z) = r + s - \dim (Y), and each Z_ i \to Z is generically finite. In particular, it follows that V \to f(V) has finite fibre over the generic point \xi of Z. Thus V \to Y is finite in an open neighbourhood of \xi , see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.21.2. Using a very general projection formula for derived tensor products, we get
see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.22.1. Since f is flat, we see that Lf^*\mathcal{O}_ W = f^*\mathcal{O}_ W. Since f|_ V is finite in an open neighbourhood of \xi we have
for any coherent sheaf on X whose support is contained in V (see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.20.8). Thus we conclude that
for all i. Since f^*[W] = [f^*\mathcal{O}_ W]_{s + e} by Lemma 43.7.1 we have
by Lemma 43.19.4. Applying Lemma 43.6.1 we find
Since f_*[V] = [f_*\mathcal{O}_ V]_ r by Lemma 43.6.1 we have
again by Lemma 43.19.4. Comparing the formula for f_*([V] \cdot f^*[W]) with the formula for f_*[V] \cdot [W] and looking at the coefficient of Z by taking lengths of stalks at \xi , we see that (43.22.1.1) finishes the proof. \square
Lemma 43.22.2. Let X \to P be a closed immersion of nonsingular varieties. Let C' \subset P \times \mathbf{P}^1 be a closed subvariety of dimension r + 1. Assume
the fibre C = C'_0 has dimension r, i.e., C' \to \mathbf{P}^1 is dominant,
C' intersects X \times \mathbf{P}^1 properly,
[C]_ r intersects X properly.
Then setting \alpha = [C]_ r \cdot X viewed as cycle on X and \beta = C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 viewed as cycle on X \times \mathbf{P}^1, we have
as cycles on X where \text{pr}_ X : X \times \mathbf{P}^1 \to X is the projection.
Proof. Let \text{pr} : P \times \mathbf{P}^1 \to P be the projection. Since we are proving an equality of cycles it suffices to think of \alpha , resp. \beta as a cycle on P, resp. P \times \mathbf{P}^1 and prove the result for pushing forward by \text{pr}. Because \text{pr}^*X = X \times \mathbf{P}^1 and \text{pr} defines an isomorphism of C'_0 onto C the projection formula (Lemma 43.22.1) gives
On the other hand, we have [C'_0]_ r = C' \cdot P \times 0 as cycles on P \times \mathbf{P}^1 by Lemma 43.17.1. Hence
by associativity (Lemma 43.20.1) and commutativity of the intersection product. It remains to show that the intersection product of C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 with P \times 0 on P \times \mathbf{P}^1 is equal (as a cycle) to the intersection product of \beta with X \times 0 on X \times \mathbf{P}^1. Write C' \cdot X \times \mathbf{P}^1 = \sum n_ k[E_ k] and hence \beta = \sum n_ k[E_ k] for some subvarieties E_ k \subset X \times \mathbf{P}^1 \subset P \times \mathbf{P}^1. Then both intersections are equal to \sum m_ k[E_{k, 0}] by Lemma 43.17.1 applied twice. This finishes the proof. \square
Comments (0)