The Stacks project

Lemma 33.9.3. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a proper scheme over $k$.

  1. $A = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ is a finite dimensional $k$-algebra,

  2. $A = \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} A_ i$ is a product of Artinian local $k$-algebras, one factor for each connected component of $X$,

  3. if $X$ is reduced, then $A = \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} k_ i$ is a product of fields, each a finite extension of $k$,

  4. if $X$ is geometrically reduced, then $k_ i$ is finite separable over $k$,

  5. if $X$ is geometrically connected, then $A$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$,

  6. if $X$ is geometrically irreducible, then $A$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$,

  7. if $X$ is geometrically reduced and connected, then $A = k$, and

  8. if $X$ is geometrically integral, then $A = k$.

Proof. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.19.2 we see that $A = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ is a finite dimensional $k$-algebra. This proves (1).

Then $A$ is a product of local Artinian $k$-algebras by Algebra, Lemma 10.53.2 and Proposition 10.60.7. If $X = Y \amalg Z$ with $Y$ and $Z$ open in $X$, then we obtain an idempotent $e \in A$ by taking the section of $\mathcal{O}_ X$ which is $1$ on $Y$ and $0$ on $Z$. Conversely, if $e \in A$ is an idempotent, then we get a corresponding decomposition of $X$. Finally, as $X$ has a Noetherian underlying topological space its connected components are open. Hence the connected components of $X$ correspond $1$-to-$1$ with primitive idempotents of $A$. This proves (2).

If $X$ is reduced, then $A$ is reduced. Hence the local rings $A_ i = k_ i$ are reduced and therefore fields (for example by Algebra, Lemma 10.25.1). This proves (3).

If $X$ is geometrically reduced, then $A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}})$ (equality by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2) is reduced. This implies that $k_ i \otimes _ k \overline{k}$ is a product of fields and hence $k_ i/k$ is separable for example by Algebra, Lemmas 10.44.1 and 10.44.3. This proves (4).

If $X$ is geometrically connected, then $A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}})$ is a zero dimensional local ring by part (2) and hence its spectrum has one point, in particular it is irreducible. Thus $A$ is geometrically irreducible. This proves (5). Of course (5) implies (6).

If $X$ is geometrically reduced and connected, then $A = k_1$ is a field and the extension $k_1/k$ is finite separable and geometrically irreducible. However, then $k_1 \otimes _ k \overline{k}$ is a product of $[k_1 : k]$ copies of $\overline{k}$ and we conclude that $k_1 = k$. This proves (7). Of course (7) implies (8). $\square$

Comments (4)

Comment #7106 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on

In (5), should be geometrically connected but not geometrically irreducible.

Comment #7269 by on

Well, the proof shows that is geometrically irreducible in case (5). Also, recall that is a finite dimensional -algebra here so being geometrically connected is the same thing as being geometrically irreducible.

Comment #8272 by Zhenhua Wu on

In (7), ''geometrically reduced and connected'' should be replaced by ''geometrically reduced and geometrically connected'' both in the statement and proof to reduce ambiguity.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0BUG. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.