Proof.
By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.19.2 we see that A = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) is a finite dimensional k-algebra. This proves (1).
Then A is a product of local Artinian k-algebras by Algebra, Lemma 10.53.2 and Proposition 10.60.7. If X = Y \amalg Z with Y and Z open in X, then we obtain an idempotent e \in A by taking the section of \mathcal{O}_ X which is 1 on Y and 0 on Z. Conversely, if e \in A is an idempotent, then we get a corresponding decomposition of X. Finally, as X has a Noetherian underlying topological space its connected components are open. Hence the connected components of X correspond 1-to-1 with primitive idempotents of A. This proves (2).
If X is reduced, then A is reduced. Hence the local rings A_ i = k_ i are reduced and therefore fields (for example by Algebra, Lemma 10.25.1). This proves (3).
If X is geometrically reduced, then A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}}) (equality by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2) is reduced. This implies that k_ i \otimes _ k \overline{k} is a product of fields and hence k_ i/k is separable for example by Algebra, Lemmas 10.44.2 and 10.44.4. This proves (4).
If X is geometrically connected, then A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}}) is a zero dimensional local ring by part (2) and hence its spectrum has one point, in particular it is irreducible. Thus A is geometrically irreducible. This proves (5). Of course (5) implies (6).
If X is geometrically reduced and geometrically connected, then A = k_1 is a field and the extension k_1/k is finite separable and geometrically irreducible. However, then k_1 \otimes _ k \overline{k} is a product of [k_1 : k] copies of \overline{k} and we conclude that k_1 = k. This proves (7). Of course (7) implies (8).
\square
Comments (4)
Comment #7106 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on
Comment #7269 by Johan on
Comment #8272 by Zhenhua Wu on
Comment #8908 by Stacks project on