The Stacks project

Lemma 31.28.5. Let $R$ be a UFD. The Picard group of $\mathbf{P}^ n_ R$ is $\mathbf{Z}$. More precisely, there is an isomorphism

\[ \mathbf{Z} \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (\mathbf{P}^ n_ R),\quad m \longmapsto \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ R}(m) \]

In particular, the Picard group of $\mathbf{P}^ n_ k$ of projective space over a field $k$ is $\mathbf{Z}$.

Proof. By Lemma 31.28.4 the Picard groups of the opens $D_+(T_ i) \cong \mathbf{A}^ n_ R$ are trivial. Thus if $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible module on $\mathbf{P}^ n_ R$, then it is given by a $1$-cocycle with values in the sheaf of invertible functors $\mathcal{O}^*$ for the open covering

\[ \mathbf{P}^ n_ R = \bigcup \nolimits _{i = 0, \ldots , n} D_+(T_ i) \]

Observe that for $i \not= j$ we have

\[ \mathcal{O}^*(D_+(T_ i) \cap D_+(T_ j)) = \mathcal{O}^*(D_+(T_ iT_ j)) = \left(R[T_0, \ldots , T_ n]_{(T_ iT_ j)}\right)^* = R^* \times (T_ i/T_ j)^\mathbf {Z} \]

Thus such a cocycle $(g_{ij})$ is given by units

\[ g_{ij} = u_{ij} (T_ i/T_ j)^{e_{ij}} \]

with $u_{ij} \in R^*$ and $e_{ij} \in \mathbf{Z}$ satisfying the cocycle condition. The cocycle condition over $D_+(T_ iT_ jT_ k)$ for $\# \{ i, j, k\} = 3$ tell us that

\[ u_{ik} = u_{ij} u_{jk} \quad \text{and}\quad e_{ik} = e_{ij} = e_{jk} \]

Whence $u_{ij} = u_{i1} u_{j1}^{-1}$ is a boundary. Thus all isomorphism classes of invertible modules are given by taking the cocycle with

\[ g_{ij} = (T_ i/T_ j)^ e \]

for some $e \in \mathbf{Z}$. Since $\mathcal{O}(n)$ has trivializing section $T_ i^ n$ over $D_+(T_ i)$ we see that the corresponding cocycle of $\mathcal{O}(n)$ is $(T_ i/T_ j)^ n$ and the proof is complete. $\square$

Comments (3)

Comment #8764 by on

Maybe one can use \ref{} to reduce to the Noetherian case, but I'm not sure if every UFD is a colimit of Noetherian UFDs.

Comment #9306 by on

Good catch! OK, I rewrote the proof to make it work in the non-Noetherian case. More interesting was the case of Lemma 31.28.4. Finally, Lemma 31.31.3 was unfixable and I needed to assume the Noetherian assumption. See these changes.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0BXJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.