Lemma 32.16.1. Let f : X \to S and h : U \to X be morphisms of schemes. Assume that S is locally Noetherian, that f and h are of finite type, that f is separated, and that h(U) is dense in X. If given any commutative solid diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r] \ar[d] & U \ar[r]^ h & X \ar[d]^ f \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[rr] \ar@{-->}[rru] & & S }
where A is a discrete valuation ring with field of fractions K, there exists a dotted arrow making the diagram commute, then f is proper.
Proof.
There is an immediate reduction to the case where S is affine. Then U is quasi-compact. Let U = U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n be an affine open covering. We may replace U by U_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg U_ n without changing the assumptions, hence we may assume U is affine. Thus we can find an open immersion U \to Y over X with Y proper over X. (First put U inside \mathbf{A}^ n_ X using Morphisms, Lemma 29.39.2 and then take the closure inside \mathbf{P}^ n_ X, or you can directly use Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.12.) We can assume U is dense in Y (replace Y by the scheme theoretic closure of U if necessary, see Morphisms, Section 29.7). Note that g : Y \to X is surjective as the image is closed and contains the dense subset h(U). We will show that Y \to S is proper. This will imply that X \to S is proper by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.9 thereby finishing the proof. To show that Y \to S is proper we will use part (4) of Lemma 32.15.3. To do this consider a diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r]_ y \ar[d] & Y \ar[d]^{f \circ g} \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[r] \ar@{..>}[ru] & S }
where A is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and where y : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to Y is the inclusion of a generic point. We have to show there exists a unique dotted arrow. Uniqueness holds by the converse to the valuative criterion for separatedness (Schemes, Lemma 26.22.1) since Y \to S is separated as the composition of the separated morphisms Y \to X and X \to S (Schemes, Lemma 26.21.12). Existence can be seen as follows. As y is a generic point of Y, it is contained in U. By assumption of the lemma there exists a morphism a : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to X such that
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r]_ y \ar[d] & U \ar[r] & X \ar[d]^ f \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[rr] \ar[rru]^ a & & S }
is commutative. Then since Y \to X is proper, we can apply the valuative criterion for properness (Morphisms, Lemma 29.42.1) to find a morphism b : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to Y such that
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r]_ y \ar[d] & Y \ar[d]^ g \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[r]^ a \ar[ru]^ b & X }
is commutative. This finishes the proof since b can serve as the dotted arrow above.
\square
Comments (0)