The Stacks project

Lemma 101.37.5. Consider a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{X} \ar[rr] \ar[rd] & & \mathcal{Y} \ar[ld] \\ & \mathcal{Z} & } \]

of algebraic stacks.

  1. If $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is universally closed and $\mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is separated, then the morphism $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is universally closed. In particular, the image of $|\mathcal{X}|$ in $|\mathcal{Y}|$ is closed.

  2. If $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is proper and $\mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is separated, then the morphism $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is proper.

Proof. Assume $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is universally closed and $\mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is separated. We factor the morphism as $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Y}$. The first morphism is proper (Lemma 101.4.8) hence universally closed. The projection $\mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is the base change of a universally closed morphism and hence universally closed, see Lemma 101.13.3. Thus $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is universally closed as the composition of universally closed morphisms, see Lemma 101.13.4. This proves (1). To deduce (2) combine (1) with Lemmas 101.4.12, 101.7.7, and 101.17.8. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CPT. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.