Lemma 15.86.12 (Emmanouil). Let (A_ n) be an inverse system of abelian groups. The following are equivalent
(A_ n) is Mittag-Leffler,
R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ n = 0 and the same holds for \bigoplus _{i \in \mathbf{N}} (A_ n).
Taken from [Emmanouil].
Lemma 15.86.12 (Emmanouil). Let (A_ n) be an inverse system of abelian groups. The following are equivalent
(A_ n) is Mittag-Leffler,
R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ n = 0 and the same holds for \bigoplus _{i \in \mathbf{N}} (A_ n).
Proof. Set B = \bigoplus _{i \in \mathbf{N}} (A_ n) and hence B = (B_ n) with B_ n = \bigoplus _{i \in \mathbf{N}} A_ n. If (A_ n) is ML, then B is ML and hence R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ n = 0 and R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits B_ n = 0 by Lemma 15.86.1.
Conversely, assume (A_ n) is not ML. Then we can pick an m and a sequence of integers m < m_1 < m_2 < \ldots and elements x_ i \in A_{m_ i} whose image y_ i \in A_ m is not in the image of A_{m_ i + 1} \to A_ m. We will use the elements x_ i and y_ i to show that R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits B_ n \not= 0 in two ways. This will finish the proof of the lemma.
First proof. Set C = (C_ n) with C_ n = \prod _{i \in \mathbf{N}} A_ n. There is a canonical injective map B_ n \to C_ n with cokernel Q_ n. Set Q = (Q_ n). We may and do think of elements q_ n of Q_ n as sequences of elements q_ n = (q_{n, 1}, q_{n, 2}, \ldots ) with q_{n, i} \in A_ n modulo sequences whose tail is zero (in other words, we identify sequences which differ in finitely many places). We have a short exact sequence of inverse systems
Consider the element q_ n \in Q_ n given by
Then it is clear that q_{n + 1} maps to q_ n. Hence we obtain q = (q_ n) \in \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Q_ n. On the other hand, we claim that q is not in the image of \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits C_ n \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Q_ n. Namely, say that c = (c_ n) maps to q. Then we can write c_ n = (c_{n, i}) and since c_{n', i} \mapsto c_{n, i} for n' \geq n, we see that c_{n, i} \in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(C_{n'} \to C_ n) for all n, i, n' \geq n. In particular, the image of c_{m, i} in A_ m is in \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(A_{m_ i + 1} \to A_ m) whence cannot be equal to y_ i. Thus c_ m and q_ m = (y_1, y_2, y_3, \ldots ) differ in infinitely many spots, which is a contradiction. Considering the long exact cohomology sequence
we conclude that the last group is nonzero as desired.
Second proof. For n' \geq n we denote A_{n, n'} = \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(A_{n'} \to A_ n). Then we have y_ i \in A_ m, y_ i \not\in A_{m, m_ i + 1}. Let \xi = (\xi _ n) \in \prod B_ n be the element with \xi _ n = 0 unless n = m_ i and \xi _{m_ i} = (0, \ldots , 0, x_ i, 0, \ldots ) with x_ i placed in the ith summand. We claim that \xi is not in the image of the map \prod B_ n \to \prod B_ n of Lemma 15.86.1. This shows that R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits B_ n is nonzero and finishes the proof. Namely, suppose that \xi is the image of \eta = (z_1, z_2, \ldots ) with z_ n = \sum z_{n, i} \in \bigoplus _ i A_ n. Observe that x_ i = z_{m_ i, i} \bmod A_{m_ i, m_ i + 1}. Then z_{m_ i - 1, i} is the image of z_{m_ i, i} under A_{m_ i} \to A_{m_ i - 1}, and so on, and we conclude that z_{m, i} is the image of z_{m_ i, i} under A_{m_ i} \to A_ m. We conclude that z_{m, i} is congruent to y_ i modulo A_{m, m_ i + 1}. In particular z_{m, i} \not= 0. This is impossible as \sum z_{m, i} \in \bigoplus _ i A_ m hence only a finite number of z_{m, i} can be nonzero. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: