Lemma 36.34.1. Let $A$ be a ring. Let $R$ be a (possibly noncommutative) $A$-algebra which is finite free as an $A$-module. Then any object $M$ of $D(R)$ which is pseudo-coherent in $D(A)$ can be represented by a bounded above complex of finite free (right) $R$-modules.

## 36.34 Characterizing pseudo-coherent complexes, II

This section is a continuation of Section 36.19. In this section we discuss characterizations of pseudo-coherent complexes in terms of cohomology. More results of this nature can be found in More on Morphisms, Section 37.69.

**Proof.**
Choose a complex $M^\bullet $ of right $R$-modules representing $M$. Since $M$ is pseudo-coherent we have $H^ i(M) = 0$ for large enough $i$. Let $m$ be the smallest index such that $H^ m(M)$ is nonzero. Then $H^ m(M)$ is a finite $A$-module by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.64.3. Thus we can choose a finite free $R$-module $F^ m$ and a map $F^ m \to M^ m$ such that $F^ m \to M^ m \to M^{m + 1}$ is zero and such that $F^ m \to H^ m(M)$ is surjective. Picture:

By descending induction on $n \leq m$ we are going to construct finite free $R$-modules $F^ i$ for $i \geq n$, differentials $d^ i : F^ i \to F^{i + 1}$ for $i \geq n$, maps $\alpha : F^ i \to K^ i$ compatible with differentials, such that (1) $H^ i(\alpha )$ is an isomorphism for $i > n$ and surjective for $i = n$, and (2) $F^ i = 0$ for $i > m$. Picture

The base case is $n = m$ which we've done above. Induction step. Let $C^\bullet $ be the cone on $\alpha $ (Derived Categories, Definition 13.9.1). The long exact sequence of cohomology shows that $H^ i(C^\bullet ) = 0$ for $i \geq n$. Observe that $F^\bullet $ is pseudo-coherent as a complex of $A$-modules because $R$ is finite free as an $A$-module. Hence by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.64.2 we see that $C^\bullet $ is $(n - 1)$-pseudo-coherent as a complex of $A$-modules. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.64.3 we see that $H^{n - 1}(C^\bullet )$ is a finite $A$-module. Choose a finite free $R$-module $F^{n - 1}$ and a map $\beta : F^{n - 1} \to C^{n - 1}$ such that the composition $F^{n - 1} \to C^{n - 1} \to C^ n$ is zero and such that $F^{n - 1}$ surjects onto $H^{n - 1}(C^\bullet )$. Since $C^{n - 1} = M^{n - 1} \oplus F^ n$ we can write $\beta = (\alpha ^{n - 1}, -d^{n - 1})$. The vanishing of the composition $F^{n - 1} \to C^{n - 1} \to C^ n$ implies these maps fit into a morphism of complexes

Moreover, these maps define a morphism of distinguished triangles

Hence our choice of $\beta $ implies that the map of complexes $(F^{n - 1} \to \ldots ) \to M^\bullet $ induces an isomorphism on cohomology in degrees $\geq n$ and a surjection in degree $n - 1$. This finishes the proof of the lemma. $\square$

Lemma 36.34.2. Let $A$ be a ring. Let $n \geq 0$. Let $K \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A})$. The following are equivalent

$K$ is pseudo-coherent,

$R\Gamma (\mathbf{P}^ n_ A, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is a pseudo-coherent object of $D(A)$ for each pseudo-coherent object $E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A})$,

$R\Gamma (\mathbf{P}^ n_ A, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is a pseudo-coherent object of $D(A)$ for each perfect object $E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A})$,

$R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A}(E, K)$ is a pseudo-coherent object of $D(A)$ for each perfect object $E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A})$,

$R\Gamma (\mathbf{P}^ n_ A, K \otimes ^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A}(d))$ is pseudo-coherent object of $D(A)$ for $d = 0, 1, \ldots , n$.

**Proof.**
Recall that

by definition, see Cohomology, Section 20.44. Thus parts (4) and (3) are equivalent by Cohomology, Lemma 20.50.5.

Since every perfect complex is pseudo-coherent, it is clear that (2) implies (3).

Assume (1) holds. Then $E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K$ is pseudo-coherent for every pseudo-coherent $E$, see Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.5. By Lemma 36.30.5 the direct image of such a pseudo-coherent complex is pseudo-coherent and we see that (2) is true.

Part (3) implies (5) because we can take $E = \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A}(d)$ for $d = 0, 1, \ldots , n$.

To finish the proof we have to show that (5) implies (1). Let $P$ be as in (36.20.0.1) and $R$ as in (36.20.0.2). By Lemma 36.20.1 we have an equivalence

Let $M \in D(R)$ be an object such that $M \otimes ^\mathbf {L} P = K$. By Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.35.4 there is an isomorphism

in $D(A)$. Arguing as above we obtain

Using that $P^\vee $ is the direct sum of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ A}(d)$ for $d = 0, 1, \ldots , n$ and (5) we conclude $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (R, M)$ is pseudo-coherent as a complex of $A$-modules. Of course $M = R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (R, M)$ in $D(A)$. Thus $M$ is pseudo-coherent as a complex of $A$-modules. By Lemma 36.34.1 we may represent $M$ by a bounded above complex $F^\bullet $ of finite free $R$-modules. Then $F^\bullet = \bigcup _{p \geq 0} \sigma _{\geq p}F^\bullet $ is a filtration which shows that $F^\bullet $ is a differential graded $R$-module with property (P), see Differential Graded Algebra, Section 22.20. Hence $K = M \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_ R P$ is represented by $F^\bullet \otimes _ R P$ (follows from the construction of the derived tensor functor, see for example the proof of Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.35.3). Since $F^\bullet \otimes _ R P$ is a bounded above complex whose terms are direct sums of copies of $P$ we conclude that the lemma is true. $\square$

Lemma 36.34.3. Let $A$ be a ring. Let $X$ be a scheme over $A$ which is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Let $K \in D^-_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. If $R\Gamma (X, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is pseudo-coherent in $D(A)$ for every perfect $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, then $R\Gamma (X, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is pseudo-coherent in $D(A)$ for every pseudo-coherent $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$.

**Proof.**
There exists an integer $N$ such that $R\Gamma (X, -) : D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D(A)$ has cohomological dimension $N$ as explained in Lemma 36.4.1. Let $b \in \mathbf{Z}$ be such that $H^ i(K) = 0$ for $i > b$. Let $E$ be pseudo-coherent on $X$. It suffices to show that $R\Gamma (X, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent for every $m$. Choose an approximation $P \to E$ by a perfect complex $P$ of $(X, E, m - N - 1 - b)$. This is possible by Theorem 36.14.6. Choose a distinguished triangle

in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. The cohomology sheaves of $C$ are zero in degrees $\geq m - N - 1 - b$. Hence the cohomology sheaves of $C \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K$ are zero in degrees $\geq m - N - 1$. Thus the cohomology of $R\Gamma (X, C \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ are zero in degrees $\geq m - 1$. Hence

is an isomorphism on cohomology in degrees $\geq m$. By assumption the source is pseudo-coherent. We conclude that $R\Gamma (X, E \otimes ^\mathbf {L} K)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent as desired. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)