Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 70.4.3. Let S be a scheme. Let I be a directed set. Let (X_ i, f_{i'i}) \to (Y_ i, g_{i'i}) be a morphism of inverse systems over I of algebraic spaces over S. Assume

  1. the morphisms f_{i'i} : X_{i'} \to X_ i are affine,

  2. the morphisms g_{i'i} : Y_{i'} \to Y_ i are affine,

  3. the morphisms X_ i \to Y_ i are closed immersions.

Then \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Y_ i is a closed immersion.

Proof. Observe that \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i and \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Y_ i exist by Lemma 70.4.1. Pick 0 \in I and choose an affine scheme V_0 and an étale morphism V_0 \to Y_0. Then the morphisms V_ i = Y_ i \times _{Y_0} V_0 \to U_ i = X_ i \times _{Y_0} V_0 are closed immersions of affine schemes. Hence the morphism V = Y \times _{Y_0} V_0 \to U = X \times _{Y_0} V_0 is a closed immersion because V = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits V_ i, U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i and because a limit of closed immersions of affine schemes is a closed immersion: a filtered colimit of surjective ring maps is surjective. Since the étale morphisms V \to Y form an étale covering of Y as we vary our choice of V_0 \to Y_0 we see that the lemma is true. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.