Lemma 99.11.3. In Situation 99.11.1. If $\mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$ is an isomorphism for all schemes $T$ over $B$, then
is an exact sequence for all $T$.
Lemma 99.11.3. In Situation 99.11.1. If $\mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$ is an isomorphism for all schemes $T$ over $B$, then
is an exact sequence for all $T$.
Proof. We may replace $B$ by $T$ and $X$ by $X_ T$ and assume that $B = T$ to simplify the notation. Let $\mathcal{N}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ B$-module. If $f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{O}_ X$, then we see that $f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \cong f_*\mathcal{O}_ X \cong \mathcal{O}_ B$ by assumption. Since $\mathcal{N}$ is locally trivial, we see that the canonical map $\mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N}$ is locally an isomorphism (because $\mathcal{O}_ B \to f_*f^*\mathcal{O}_ B$ is an isomorphism by assumption). Hence we conclude that $\mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \to \mathcal{O}_ B$ is an isomorphism and we see that $\mathcal{N}$ is trivial. This proves the first arrow is injective.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module which is in the kernel of $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X) \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/B}(B)$. Then there exists an fppf covering $\{ B_ i \to B\} $ such that $\mathcal{L}$ pulls back to the trivial invertible sheaf on $X_{B_ i}$. Choose a trivializing section $s_ i$. Then $\text{pr}_0^*s_ i$ and $\text{pr}_1^*s_ j$ are both trivialising sections of $\mathcal{L}$ over $X_{B_ i \times _ B B_ j}$ and hence differ by a multiplicative unit
(equality by our assumption on pushforward of structure sheaves). Of course these elements satisfy the cocycle condition on $B_ i \times _ B B_ j \times _ B B_ k$, hence they define a descent datum on invertible sheaves for the fppf covering $\{ B_ i \to B\} $. By Descent, Proposition 35.5.2 there is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ B$-module $\mathcal{N}$ with trivializations over $B_ i$ whose associated descent datum is $\{ f_{ij}\} $. (The proposition applies because $B$ is a scheme by the replacement performed at the start of the proof.) Then $f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{L}$ as the functor from descent data to modules is fully faithful. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)