The Stacks project

Lemma 58.94.4. In Lemma 58.94.2 assume $f$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and surjective. Then the functor

\[ \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \left\{ (\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, \alpha ) \middle | \begin{matrix} \mathcal{G} \in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}),\ \mathcal{H} \in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_{fppf}), \\ \alpha : a_ X^{-1}\mathcal{G} \to f_{big, fppf}^{-1}\mathcal{H} \text{ an isomorphism} \end{matrix} \right\} \]

sending $\mathcal{F}$ to $(f_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{F}, a_ Y^{-1}\mathcal{F}, can)$ is an equivalence.

Proof. The functor $a_ X^{-1}$ is fully faithful (as $a_{X, *}a_ X^{-1} = \text{id}$ by Lemma 58.94.1). Hence the forgetful functor $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, \alpha ) \mapsto \mathcal{H}$ identifies the category of triples with a full subcategory of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_{fppf})$. Moreover, the functor $a_ Y^{-1}$ is fully faithful, hence the functor in the lemma is fully faithful as well.

Suppose that we have an étale covering $\{ Y_ i \to Y\} $. Let $f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i$ be the base change of $f$. Denote $f_{ij} = f_ i \times f_ j : X_ i \times _ X X_ j \to Y_ i \times _ Y Y_ j$. Claim: if the lemma is true for $f_ i$ and $f_{ij}$ for all $i, j$, then the lemma is true for $f$. To see this, note that the given étale covering determines an étale covering of the final object in each of the four sites $Y_{\acute{e}tale}, X_{\acute{e}tale}, (\mathit{Sch}/Y)_{fppf}, (\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf}$. Thus the category of sheaves is equivalent to the category of glueing data for this covering (Sites, Lemma 7.26.5) in each of the four cases. A huge commutative diagram of categories then finishes the proof of the claim. We omit the details. The claim shows that we may work étale locally on $Y$.

Note that $\{ X \to Y\} $ is an fppf covering. Working étale locally on $Y$, we may assume there exists a morphism $s : X' \to X$ such that the composition $f' = f \circ s : X' \to Y$ is surjective finite locally free, see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.43.1. Claim: if the lemma is true for $f'$, then it is true for $f$. Namely, given a triple $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, \alpha )$ for $f$, we can pullback by $s$ to get a triple $(s_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, s_{big, fppf}^{-1}\alpha )$ for $f'$. A solution for this triple gives a sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ with $a_ Y^{-1}\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{H}$. By the first paragraph of the proof this means the triple is in the essential image. This reduces us to the case described in the next paragraph.

Assume $f$ is surjective finite locally free. Let $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, \alpha )$ be a triple. In this case consider the triple

\[ (\mathcal{G}_1, \mathcal{H}_1, \alpha _1) = (f_{small}^{-1}f_{small, *}\mathcal{G}, f_{big, fppf, *}f_{big, fppf}^{-1}\mathcal{H}, \alpha _1) \]

where $\alpha _1$ comes from the identifications

\begin{align*} a_ X^{-1}f_{small}^{-1}f_{small, *}\mathcal{G} & = f_{big, fppf}^{-1}a_ Y^{-1}f_{small, *}\mathcal{G} \\ & = f_{big, fppf}^{-1}f_{big, fppf, *}a_ X^{-1}\mathcal{G} \\ & \to f_{big, fppf}^{-1}f_{big, fppf, *}f_{big, fppf}^{-1}\mathcal{H} \end{align*}

where the third equality is Lemma 58.94.3 and the arrow is given by $\alpha $. This triple is in the image of our functor because $\mathcal{F}_1 = f_{small, *}\mathcal{F}$ is a solution (to see this use Lemma 58.94.3 again; details omitted). There is a canonical map of triples

\[ (\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}, \alpha ) \to (\mathcal{G}_1, \mathcal{H}_1, \alpha _1) \]

which uses the unit $\text{id} \to f_{big, fppf, *}f_{big, fppf}^{-1}$ on the second entry (it is enough to prescribe morphisms on the second entry by the first paragraph of the proof). Since $\{ f : X \to Y\} $ is an fppf covering the map $\mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H}_1$ is injective (details omitted). Set

\[ \mathcal{G}_2 = \mathcal{G}_1 \amalg _\mathcal {G} \mathcal{G}_1\quad \mathcal{H}_2 = \mathcal{H}_1 \amalg _\mathcal {H} \mathcal{H}_1 \]

and let $\alpha _2$ be the induced isomorphism (pullback functors are exact, so this makes sense). Then $\mathcal{H}$ is the equalizer of the two maps $\mathcal{H}_1 \to \mathcal{H}_2$. Repeating the arguments above for the triple $(\mathcal{G}_2, \mathcal{H}_2, \alpha _2)$ we find an injective morphism of triples

\[ (\mathcal{G}_2, \mathcal{H}_2, \alpha _2) \to (\mathcal{G}_3, \mathcal{H}_3, \alpha _3) \]

such that this last triple is in the image of our functor. Say it corresponds to $\mathcal{F}_3$ in $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale})$. By fully faithfulness we obtain two maps $\mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_3$ and we can let $\mathcal{F}$ be the equalizer of these two maps. By exactness of the pullback functors involved we find that $a_ Y^{-1}\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{H}$ as desired. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DEU. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.