Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Remark 107.5.3. (1) One easily verifies (for example, by using the invariance of the relative dimension of locally of finite type morphisms of schemes under base-change; see for example Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.3) that \dim _ t(T_ x) is well-defined, independently of the choices used to compute it.

(2) In the case that \mathcal{X} is also an algebraic space, it is straightforward to confirm that this definition agrees with the definition of relative dimension given in Morphisms of Spaces, Definition 67.33.1.


Comments (2)

Comment #3415 by David Zureick-Brown on

(1) is missing a parenthesis. \ref{}


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.