Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 51.4.1. Let I \subset A be a finitely generated ideal of a ring A. Set Y = V(I) \subset X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Let d \geq -1 be an integer. The following are equivalent

  1. H^ i_ Y(A) = 0 for i > d,

  2. H^ i_ Y(M) = 0 for i > d for every A-module M, and

  3. if d = -1, then Y = \emptyset , if d = 0, then Y is open and closed in X, and if d > 0 then H^ i(X \setminus Y, \mathcal{F}) = 0 for i \geq d for every quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_{X \setminus Y}-module \mathcal{F}.

Proof. Observe that R\Gamma _ Y(-) has finite cohomological dimension by Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 47.9.1 for example. Hence there exists an integer i_0 such that H^ i_ Y(M) = 0 for all A-modules M and i \geq i_0.

Let us prove that (1) and (2) are equivalent. It is immediate that (2) implies (1). Assume (1). By descending induction on i > d we will show that H^ i_ Y(M) = 0 for all A-modules M. For i \geq i_0 we have seen this above. To do the induction step, let i_0 > i > d. Choose any A-module M and fit it into a short exact sequence 0 \to N \to F \to M \to 0 where F is a free A-module. Since R\Gamma _ Y is a right adjoint, we see that H^ i_ Y(-) commutes with direct sums. Hence H^ i_ Y(F) = 0 as i > d by assumption (1). Then we see that H^ i_ Y(M) = H^{i + 1}_ Y(N) = 0 as desired.

Assume d = -1 and (2) holds. Then 0 = H^0_ Y(A/I) = A/I \Rightarrow A = I \Rightarrow Y = \emptyset . Thus (3) holds. We omit the proof of the converse.

Assume d = 0 and (2) holds. Set J = H^0_ I(A) = \{ x \in A \mid I^ nx = 0 \text{ for some }n > 0\} . Then

H^1_ Y(A) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(A \to \Gamma (X \setminus Y, \mathcal{O}_{X \setminus Y})) \quad \text{and}\quad H^1_ Y(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(I \to \Gamma (X \setminus Y, \mathcal{O}_{X \setminus Y}))

and the kernel of the first map is equal to J. See Lemma 51.2.2. We conclude from (2) that I(A/J) = A/J. Thus we may pick f \in I mapping to 1 in A/J. Then 1 - f \in J so I^ n(1 - f) = 0 for some n > 0. Hence f^ n = f^{n + 1}. Then e = f^ n \in I is an idempotent. Consider the complementary idempotent e' = 1 - f^ n \in J. For any element g \in I we have g^ m e' = 0 for some m > 0. Thus I is contained in the radical of ideal (e) \subset I. This means Y = V(I) = V(e) is open and closed in X as predicted in (3). Conversely, if Y = V(I) is open and closed, then the functor H^0_ Y(-) is exact and has vanshing higher derived functors.

If d > 0, then we see immediately from Lemma 51.2.2 that (2) is equivalent to (3). \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.