Proof.
Observe that R\Gamma _ Y(-) has finite cohomological dimension by Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 47.9.1 for example. Hence there exists an integer i_0 such that H^ i_ Y(M) = 0 for all A-modules M and i \geq i_0.
Let us prove that (1) and (2) are equivalent. It is immediate that (2) implies (1). Assume (1). By descending induction on i > d we will show that H^ i_ Y(M) = 0 for all A-modules M. For i \geq i_0 we have seen this above. To do the induction step, let i_0 > i > d. Choose any A-module M and fit it into a short exact sequence 0 \to N \to F \to M \to 0 where F is a free A-module. Since R\Gamma _ Y is a right adjoint, we see that H^ i_ Y(-) commutes with direct sums. Hence H^ i_ Y(F) = 0 as i > d by assumption (1). Then we see that H^ i_ Y(M) = H^{i + 1}_ Y(N) = 0 as desired.
Assume d = -1 and (2) holds. Then 0 = H^0_ Y(A/I) = A/I \Rightarrow A = I \Rightarrow Y = \emptyset . Thus (3) holds. We omit the proof of the converse.
Assume d = 0 and (2) holds. Set J = H^0_ I(A) = \{ x \in A \mid I^ nx = 0 \text{ for some }n > 0\} . Then
H^1_ Y(A) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(A \to \Gamma (X \setminus Y, \mathcal{O}_{X \setminus Y})) \quad \text{and}\quad H^1_ Y(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(I \to \Gamma (X \setminus Y, \mathcal{O}_{X \setminus Y}))
and the kernel of the first map is equal to J. See Lemma 51.2.2. We conclude from (2) that I(A/J) = A/J. Thus we may pick f \in I mapping to 1 in A/J. Then 1 - f \in J so I^ n(1 - f) = 0 for some n > 0. Hence f^ n = f^{n + 1}. Then e = f^ n \in I is an idempotent. Consider the complementary idempotent e' = 1 - f^ n \in J. For any element g \in I we have g^ m e' = 0 for some m > 0. Thus I is contained in the radical of ideal (e) \subset I. This means Y = V(I) = V(e) is open and closed in X as predicted in (3). Conversely, if Y = V(I) is open and closed, then the functor H^0_ Y(-) is exact and has vanshing higher derived functors.
If d > 0, then we see immediately from Lemma 51.2.2 that (2) is equivalent to (3).
\square
Comments (0)