Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 52.16.2. In Situation 52.16.1. Consider an inverse system (M_ n) of A-modules such that

  1. M_ n is a finite A-module,

  2. M_ n is annihilated by I^ n,

  3. the kernel and cokernel of M_{n + 1}/I^ nM_{n + 1} \to M_ n are \mathfrak a-power torsion.

Then (\widetilde{M}_ n|_ U) is in \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). Conversely, every object of \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U) arises in this manner.

Proof. We omit the verification that (\widetilde{M}_ n|_ U) is in \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). Let (\mathcal{F}_ n) be an object of \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). By Local Cohomology, Lemma 51.8.2 we see that \mathcal{F}_ n = \widetilde{M_ n} for some finite A/I^ n-module M_ n. After dividing M_ n by H^0_\mathfrak a(M_ n) we may assume M_ n \subset H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n), see Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 47.11.6 and the already referenced lemma. After replacing inductively M_{n + 1} by the inverse image of M_ n under the map M_{n + 1} \to H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_{n + 1}) \to H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n), we may assume M_{n + 1} maps into M_ n. This gives a inverse system (M_ n) satisfying (1) and (2) such that \mathcal{F}_ n = \widetilde{M_ n}. To see that (3) holds, use that M_{n + 1}/I^ nM_{n + 1} \to M_ n is a map of finite A-modules which induces an isomorphism after applying \widetilde{\ } and restriction to U (here we use the first referenced lemma one more time). \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.