Lemma 52.16.2. In Situation 52.16.1. Consider an inverse system (M_ n) of A-modules such that
M_ n is a finite A-module,
M_ n is annihilated by I^ n,
the kernel and cokernel of M_{n + 1}/I^ nM_{n + 1} \to M_ n are \mathfrak a-power torsion.
Then (\widetilde{M}_ n|_ U) is in \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). Conversely, every object of \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U) arises in this manner.
Proof.
We omit the verification that (\widetilde{M}_ n|_ U) is in \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). Let (\mathcal{F}_ n) be an object of \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). By Local Cohomology, Lemma 51.8.2 we see that \mathcal{F}_ n = \widetilde{M_ n} for some finite A/I^ n-module M_ n. After dividing M_ n by H^0_\mathfrak a(M_ n) we may assume M_ n \subset H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n), see Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 47.11.6 and the already referenced lemma. After replacing inductively M_{n + 1} by the inverse image of M_ n under the map M_{n + 1} \to H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_{n + 1}) \to H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n), we may assume M_{n + 1} maps into M_ n. This gives a inverse system (M_ n) satisfying (1) and (2) such that \mathcal{F}_ n = \widetilde{M_ n}. To see that (3) holds, use that M_{n + 1}/I^ nM_{n + 1} \to M_ n is a map of finite A-modules which induces an isomorphism after applying \widetilde{\ } and restriction to U (here we use the first referenced lemma one more time).
\square
Comments (0)