The Stacks project

Lemma 31.16.7. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme with affine diagonal. Let $U \subset X$ be a dense affine open. If $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is a UFD for all $x \in X \setminus U$, then there exists an effective Cartier divisor $D \subset X$ with $U = X \setminus D$.

Proof. Since $X$ is Noetherian, the complement $X \setminus U$ has finitely many irreducible components $D_1, \ldots , D_ r$ (Properties, Lemma 28.5.7 applied to the reduced induced subscheme structure on $X \setminus U$). We view $D_ i$ as a reduced closed subscheme of $X$. Let $X = \bigcup _{j \in J} X_ j$ be an affine open covering of $X$. For all $j$ in $J$, set $U_ j = U \cap X_ j$. Since $X$ has affine diagonal, the scheme

\[ U_ j = X \times _{(X \times X)} (U \times X_ j) \]

is affine. Therefore, as $X_ j$ is separated, it follows from Lemma 31.16.6 and its proof that for all $j \in J$ and $1 \leq i \leq r$ the intersection $D_ i \cap X_ j$ is either empty or an effective Cartier divisor in $X_ j$. Thus $D_ i \subset X$ is an effective Cartier divisor (as this is a local property). Hence we can take $D = D_1 + \ldots + D_ r$. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 31.16: Complements of affine opens

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EGJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.