Lemma 82.14.1. In Situation 82.2.1 let X, Y/B be good. Assume X, Y are integral and n = \dim _\delta (X) = \dim _\delta (Y). Let p : X \to Y be a dominant proper morphism. Let f \in R(X)^*. Set
Then we have p_*\text{div}(f) = \text{div}(g).
This section is the analogue of Chow Homology, Section 42.18.
Lemma 82.14.1. In Situation 82.2.1 let X, Y/B be good. Assume X, Y are integral and n = \dim _\delta (X) = \dim _\delta (Y). Let p : X \to Y be a dominant proper morphism. Let f \in R(X)^*. Set
Then we have p_*\text{div}(f) = \text{div}(g).
Proof. We are going to deduce this from the case of schemes by étale localization. Let Z \subset Y be an integral closed subspace of \delta -dimension n - 1. We want to show that the coefficient of [Z] in p_*\text{div}(f) and \text{div}(g) are equal. Apply Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.3.2 to the morphism p : X \to Y and the generic point \xi \in |Z|. We find that we may replace Y by an open subspace containing \xi and assume that p : X \to Y is finite. Pick an étale neighbourhood (V, v) \to (Y, \xi ) where V is an affine scheme. By Lemma 82.10.3 it suffices to prove the equality of cycles after pulling back to V. Set U = V \times _ Y X and consider the commutative diagram
Let V_ j \subset V, j = 1, \ldots , m be the irreducible components of V. For each i, let U_{j, i}, i = 1, \ldots , n_ j be the irreducible components of U dominating V_ j. Denote p'_{j, i} : U_{j, i} \to V_ j the restriction of p' : U \to V. By the case of schemes (Chow Homology, Lemma 42.18.1) we see that
where f_{j, i} is the restriction of f to U_{j, i} and g_{j, i} is the norm of f_{j, i} along the finite extension R(U_{j, i})/R(V_ j). We have
by Lemmas 82.11.1, 82.13.2, and 82.8.2. To finish the proof, using Lemma 82.13.2 again, it suffices to show that
as elements of the function field of V_ j. In terms of fields this is the following statement: let L/K be a finite extension. Let M/K be a finite separable extension. Write M \otimes _ K L = \prod M_ i. Then for t \in L with images t_ i \in M_ i the image of \text{Norm}_{L/K}(t) in M is \prod \text{Norm}_{M_ i/M}(t_ i). We omit the proof. \square
Comments (0)