Lemma 82.19.4. In Situation 82.2.1 let X, Y/B be good. Let p : X \to Y be a proper morphism. Let \alpha \in Z_{k + 1}(X). Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible sheaf on Y. Then
in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(Y).
Lemma 82.19.4. In Situation 82.2.1 let X, Y/B be good. Let p : X \to Y be a proper morphism. Let \alpha \in Z_{k + 1}(X). Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible sheaf on Y. Then
in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(Y).
Proof. Suppose that p has the property that for every integral closed subspace W \subset X the map p|_ W : W \to Y is a closed immersion. Then, by definition of capping with c_1(\mathcal{L}) the lemma holds.
We will use this remark to reduce to a special case. Namely, write \alpha = \sum n_ i[W_ i] with n_ i \not= 0 and W_ i pairwise distinct. Let W'_ i \subset Y be the “image” of W_ i as in Lemma 82.7.1. Consider the diagram
Since \{ W_ i\} is locally finite on X, and p is proper we see that \{ W'_ i\} is locally finite on Y and that q, q', p' are also proper morphisms. We may think of \sum n_ i[W_ i] also as a k-cycle \alpha ' \in Z_ k(X'). Clearly q_*\alpha ' = \alpha . We have q_*(c_1(q^*p^*\mathcal{L}) \cap \alpha ') = c_1(p^*\mathcal{L}) \cap q_*\alpha ' and (q')_*(c_1((q')^*\mathcal{L}) \cap p'_*\alpha ') = c_1(\mathcal{L}) \cap q'_*p'_*\alpha ' by the initial remark of the proof. Hence it suffices to prove the lemma for the morphism p' and the cycle \sum n_ i[W_ i]. Clearly, this means we may assume X, Y integral, f : X \to Y dominant and \alpha = [X]. In this case the result follows from Lemma 82.19.3. \square
Comments (0)