Lemma 38.38.5. Let S be a scheme. Choose a site (\mathit{Sch}/S)_ h as in Definition 38.34.13. The rule
is the sheafification of the “structure sheaf” \mathcal{O} on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_ h. Similarly for the ph topology.
Lemma 38.38.5. Let S be a scheme. Choose a site (\mathit{Sch}/S)_ h as in Definition 38.34.13. The rule
is the sheafification of the “structure sheaf” \mathcal{O} on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_ h. Similarly for the ph topology.
Proof. In Lemma 38.38.4 we have seen that the rule \mathcal{F} of the lemma defines a sheaf in the ph topology and hence a fortiori a sheaf for the h topology. Clearly, there is a canonical map of presheaves of rings \mathcal{O} \to \mathcal{F}. To finish the proof, it suffices to show
if f \in \mathcal{O}(X) maps to zero in \mathcal{F}(X), then there is a h covering \{ X_ i \to X\} such that f|_{X_ i} = 0, and
given f \in \mathcal{F}(X) there is a h covering \{ X_ i \to X\} such that f|_{X_ i} is the image of f_ i \in \mathcal{O}(X_ i).
Let f be as in (1). Then f|_{X^{awn}} = 0. This means that f is locally nilpotent. Thus if X' \subset X is the closed subscheme cut out by f, then X' \to X is a surjective closed immersion of finite presentation. Hence \{ X' \to X\} is the desired h covering. Let f be as in (2). After replacing X by the members of an affine open covering we may assume X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is affine. Then f \in A^{awn}, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.47.6. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.46.11 we can find a ring map A \to B of finite presentation such that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is a universal homeomorphism and such that f is the image of an element b \in B under the canonical map B \to A^{awn}. Then \{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)\} is an h covering and we conclude. The statement about the ph topology follows in the same manner (or it can be deduced from the statement for the h topology). \square
Comments (0)