Lemma 21.29.4. In Situation 21.29.1 if $(V_ n)$ holds, then for $X$ in $\mathcal{C}$ and $L \in D(\mathcal{C}_{\tau '}/X)$ with $H^ i(L) = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $H^ i(L)$ in $\mathcal{A}'_ X$ for $0 \leq i \leq n$ we have $H^ n_{\tau '}(X, L) = H^ n_\tau (X, \epsilon _ X^{-1}L)$.

Proof. By Lemma 21.20.5 we have $H^ n_\tau (X, \epsilon _ X^{-1}L) = H^ n_{\tau '}(X, R\epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}L)$. There is a spectral sequence

$E_2^{p, q} = R^ p\epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}H^ q(L)$

converging to $H^{p + q}(R\epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}L)$. By $(V_ n)$ we have the vanishing of $E_2^{p, q}$ for $0 < p \leq n$ and $0 \leq q \leq n$. Thus $E_2^{0, q} = \epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}H^ q(L) = H^ q(L)$ are the only nonzero terms $E_2^{p, q}$ with $p + q \leq n$. It follows that the map

$L \longrightarrow R\epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}L$

is an isomorphism in degrees $\leq n$ (small detail omitted). Hence we find that $H^ i_{\tau '}(X, L) = H^ i_{\tau '}(X, R\epsilon _{X, *}\epsilon _ X^{-1}L)$ for $i \leq n$. Thus the lemma is proved. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EZB. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.