Proposition 37.73.7. Let X be a nonempty quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme with affine stratification number n. Then H^ p(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0, p > n for every quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F}.
Proof. We will prove this by induction on the affine stratification number n. If n = 0, then X is affine and the result is Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.2. Assume n > 0. By Definition 37.73.4 there is an affine scheme U and an affine open immersion j : U \to X such that the complement Z has affine stratification number n - 1. As U and j are affine we have H^ p(X, j_*(\mathcal{F}|_ U)) = 0 for p > 0, see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemmas 30.2.4 and 30.2.3. Denote \mathcal{K} and \mathcal{Q} the kernel and cokernel of the map \mathcal{F} \to j_*(\mathcal{F}|_ U). Thus we obtain an exact sequence
of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules (see Schemes, Section 26.24). A standard argument, breaking our exact sequence into short exact sequences and using the long exact cohomology sequence, shows it suffices to prove H^ p(X, \mathcal{K}) = 0 and H^ p(X, \mathcal{Q}) = 0 for p \geq n. Since \mathcal{F} \to j_*(\mathcal{F}|_ U) restricts to an isomorphism over U, we see that \mathcal{K} and \mathcal{Q} are supported on Z. By Properties, Lemma 28.22.3 we can write these modules as the filtered colimits of their finite type quasi-coherent submodules. Using the fact that cohomology of sheaves on X commutes with filtered colimits, see Cohomology, Lemma 20.19.1, we conclude it suffices to show that if \mathcal{G} is a finite type quasi-coherent module whose support is contained in Z, then H^ p(X, \mathcal{G}) = 0 for p \geq n. Let Z' \subset X be the scheme theoretic support of \mathcal{G} \oplus \mathcal{O}_ Z; we may and do think of \mathcal{G} as a quasi-coherent module on Z', see Morphisms, Section 29.5. Then Z' and Z have the same underlying topological space and hence the same affine stratification number, namely n - 1. Hence H^ p(X, \mathcal{G}) = H^ p(Z', \mathcal{G}) (equality by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.4) vanishes for p \geq n by induction hypothesis. \square
Comments (0)