Lemma 36.36.8. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a limit of a direct system of quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes with affine transition morphisms. Then $X$ has the resolution property if and only if $X_ i$ has the resolution properties for some $i$.

**Proof.**
If $X_ i$ has the resolution property, then $X$ does by Lemma 36.36.4. Assume $X$ has the resolution property. Choose a finite affine open covering $X = U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ m$. For each $j$ choose a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}_ j \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ such that $X \setminus V(\mathcal{I}_ j) = U_ j$, see Properties, Lemma 28.24.1. Choose finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules and surjections $\mathcal{E}_ j \to \mathcal{I}_ j$. By Limits, Lemmas 32.10.3 and 32.10.2 we can find an $i$ and finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_{X_ i}$-modules $\mathcal{E}_{i, j}$ and maps $\mathcal{E}_{i, j} \to \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}$ whose base changes to $X$ recover the maps $\mathcal{E}_ j \to \mathcal{I}_ j$, $j = 1, \ldots , m$. Denote $\mathcal{I}_{i, j} \subset \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}$ the image of these maps. Set $U_{i, j} = X_ i \setminus V(\mathcal{I}_{i, j})$. After increasing $i$ we may assume $U_{i, j}$ is affine, see Limits, Lemma 32.4.13. Then we conclude that $X_ i$ has the resolution property by Lemma 36.36.5.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: