Lemma 42.49.7. In Lemma 42.49.1 assume Q|_ T is isomorphic to a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ T-module of rank < p. Assume we have another perfect object Q' \in D(\mathcal{O}_ W) whose Chern classes are defined with Q'|_ T isomorphic to a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ T-module of rank < p' placed in cohomological degree 0. With notation as in Remark 42.34.7 set
c^{(p)}(Q) = 1 + c_1(Q|_{X \times \{ 0\} }) + \ldots + c_{p - 1}(Q|_{X \times \{ 0\} }) + c'_{p}(Q) + c'_{p + 1}(Q) + \ldots
in A^{(p)}(Z \to X) with c'_ i(Q) for i \geq p as in Lemma 42.49.1. Similarly for c^{(p')}(Q') and c^{(p + p')}(Q \oplus Q'). Then c^{(p + p')}(Q \oplus Q') = c^{(p)}(Q)c^{(p')}(Q') in A^{(p + p')}(Z \to X).
Proof.
Recall that the image of c'_ i(Q) in A^ p(X) is equal to c_ i(Q|_{X \times \{ 0\} }) for i \geq p and similarly for Q' and Q \oplus Q', see Lemma 42.49.1. Hence the equality in degrees < p + p' follows from the additivity of Lemma 42.46.7.
Let's take n \geq p + p'. As in the proof of Lemma 42.49.1 let E \subset W_\infty denote the inverse image of Z. Observe that we have the equality
c^{(p + p')}(Q|_ E \oplus Q'|_ E) = c^{(p)}(Q|_ E)c^{(p')}(Q'|_ E)
in A^{(p + p')}(E \to W_\infty ) by Lemma 42.47.8. Since by construction
c'_ p(Q \oplus Q') = (E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ p(Q|_ E \oplus Q'|_ E) \circ C
we conclude that suffices to show for all i + j = n we have
(E \to Z)_* \circ c^{(p)}_ i(Q|_ E)c^{(p')}_ j(Q'|_ E) \circ C = c^{(p)}_ i(Q)c^{(p')}_ j(Q')
in A^ n(Z \to X) where the multiplication is the one from Remark 42.34.7 on both sides. There are three cases, depending on whether i \geq p, j \geq p', or both.
Assume i \geq p and j \geq p'. In this case the products are defined by inserting (E \to W_\infty )_*, resp. (Z \to X)_* in between the two factors and taking compositions as bivariant classes, see Remark 42.34.8. In other words, we have to show
(E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ (E \to W_\infty )_* \circ c'_ j(Q'|_ E) \circ C = c'_ i(Q) \circ (Z \to X)_* \circ c'_ j(Q')
By Lemma 42.47.1 the left hand side is equal to
(E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ c_ j(Q'|_{W_\infty }) \circ C
Since c'_ i(Q) = (E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ C the right hand side is equal to
(E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ C \circ (Z \to X)_* \circ c'_ j(Q')
which is immediately seen to be equal to the above by Lemma 42.49.4.
Assume i \geq p and j < p. Unwinding the products in this case we have to show
(E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ c_ j(Q'|_{W_\infty }) \circ C = c'_ i(Q) \circ c_ j(Q'|_{X \times \{ 0\} })
Again using that c'_ i(Q) = (E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ i(Q|_ E) \circ C we see that it suffices to show c_ j(Q'|_{W_\infty }) \circ C = C \circ c_ j(Q'|_{X \times \{ 0\} }) which is part of Lemma 42.49.4.
Assume i < p and j \geq p'. Unwinding the products in this case we have to show
(E \to Z)_* \circ c_ i(Q|_ E) \circ c'_ j(Q'|_ E) \circ C = c_ i(Q|_{Z \times \{ 0\} }) \circ c'_ j(Q')
However, since c'_ j(Q|_ E) and c'_ j(Q') are bivariant classes, they commute with capping with Chern classes (Lemma 42.38.9). Hence it suffices to prove
(E \to Z)_* \circ c'_ j(Q'|_ E) \circ c_ i(Q|_{W_\infty }) \circ C = c'_ j(Q') \circ c_ i(Q|_{X \times \{ 0\} })
which we reduces us to the case discussed in the preceding paragraph.
\square
Comments (0)