Lemma 51.3.2. Let $A$ be a Noetherian local ring which is catenary and $(S_2)$. Then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is equidimensional.

[Corollary 5.10.9, EGA]

**Proof.**
Set $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Say $d = \dim (A) = \dim (X)$. Inside $X$ consider the union $X_1$ of the irreducible components of dimension $d$ and the union $X_2$ of the irreducible components of dimension $< d$. Of course $X = X_1 \cup X_2$. If $X_2 = \emptyset $, then the lemma holds. If not, then $Z = X_1 \cap X_2$ is a nonempty closed subset of $X$ because it contains at least the closed point of $X$. Hence we can choose a generic point $z \in Z$ of an irreducible component of $Z$. Recall that the spectrum of $\mathcal{O}_{Z, z}$ is the set of points of $X$ specializing to $z$. Since $z$ is both contained in an irreducible component of dimension $d$ and in an irreducible component of dimension $< d$ we obtain nontrivial specializations $x_1 \leadsto z$ and $x_2 \leadsto z$ such that the closures of $x_1$ and $x_2$ have different dimensions. Since $X$ is catenary, this can only happen if at least one of the specializations $x_1 \leadsto z$ and $x_2 \leadsto z$ is not immediate! Thus $\dim (\mathcal{O}_{Z, z}) \geq 2$. Therefore $\text{depth}(\mathcal{O}_{Z, z}) \geq 2$ because $A$ is $(S_2)$. However, the punctured spectrum $U$ of $\mathcal{O}_{Z, z}$ is disconnected because the closed subsets $U \cap X_1$ and $U \cap X_2$ are disjoint (by our choice of $z$) and cover $U$. This is a contradiction with Lemma 51.3.1 and the proof is complete.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)