The Stacks project

Lemma 50.18.1. Let $R$ be a ring and consider a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ 0 \ar[r] & K^0 \ar[r] & L^0 \ar[r] & M^0 \ar[r] & 0 \\ & & L^{-1} \ar[u]_\partial \ar@{=}[r] & M^{-1} \ar[u] } \]

of $R$-modules with exact top row and $M^0$ and $M^{-1}$ finite free of the same rank. For $p \geq 0$ there are canonical maps

\[ c^ p : \wedge ^ p(H^0(L^\bullet )) \longrightarrow \wedge ^ p(K^0) \otimes _ R \det (M^\bullet ) \]

with the following properties:

  1. $c^0(1) = \delta (M^\bullet )$, and

  2. $c^{q + p}(\omega \wedge \eta ) = \omega \wedge c^ p(\eta )$ for $\omega \in \wedge ^ q(K^0)$ and $\eta \in \wedge ^ p(H^0(L^\bullet ))$.

In particular, the composition of $c^ p$ with the map $\wedge ^ p(K^0) \to \wedge ^ p(H^0(L^\bullet ))$ is multiplication with $\delta (M^\bullet )$.

Proof. Say $M^0$ and $M^{-1}$ are free of rank $n$. For every $p \geq 0$ there is a unique surjection

\[ \pi _ p : \wedge ^{p + n}(L^0) \longrightarrow \wedge ^ p(K^0) \otimes \wedge ^ n(M^0) \]

with the following two properties; (i) we have $ \pi _ p(k_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge k_ p \wedge l_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge l_ n) = k_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge k_ p \otimes m_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge m_ n $ if $k_1, \ldots , k_ p \in K^0$ and $l_1, \ldots , l_ n \in L^0$ map to $m_1, \ldots , m_ n \in M^0$ and (ii) the kernel of $\pi _ p$ is the submodule generated by wedges $l_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge l_{p + n}$ such that $> p$ of the $l_ j$ are in $K^0$. Pick a basis $e_1, \ldots , e_ n$ for $L^{-1} = M^{-1}$. Then we define our map by the rule

\[ \eta \mapsto \pi _ p(\tilde\eta \wedge \partial (e_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge \partial (e_ n)) \otimes (e_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge e_ n)^{\otimes -1} \]

where $\eta \in \wedge ^ p(H^0(L^\bullet ))$ and $\tilde\eta \in \wedge ^ p(L^0)$ is a lift of $\eta $. The expression on the right hand side makes sense because $\det (M^\bullet ) = \wedge ^ n(M^0) \otimes \wedge ^ n(M^{-1})^{\otimes -1}$. The expression on the right is independent of the choice of $\tilde\eta $ since $\partial (\xi ) \wedge \partial (e_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge \partial (e_ n) = 0$ for any $\xi \in L^{-1}$. A straightforward calculation shows that the map is independent of the choice of the basis of $L^{-1} = M^{-1}$. It is immediate from the definition of $\delta (M^\bullet )$ in More on Algebra, Section 15.123 that $c^0(1) = \delta (M^\bullet )$. Finally, the rule in statement (2) can be directly verified from the definition. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 50.18: Comparing sheaves of differential forms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FL8. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.