Proof.
Let T and \mathcal{M}_ t \to \mathcal{M}'_ t be as in Lemma 24.25.5. Let S and \mathcal{M}_ s be as in Lemma 24.25.6. Choose an injective map \mathcal{M}_ s \to \mathcal{M}'_ s of acyclic differential graded \mathcal{A}-modules which is homotopic to zero. This is possible because we may take \mathcal{M}'_ s to be the cone on the identity; in that case it is even true that the identity on \mathcal{M}'_ s is homotopic to zero, see Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.27.4 which applies by the discussion in Section 24.22. We claim that R = T \coprod S with the given maps works.
The implication (1) \Rightarrow (2) holds by Lemma 24.25.9.
Assume (2). First, by Lemma 24.25.5 we see that \mathcal{I} is graded injective. Next, let \mathcal{M} be an acyclic differential graded \mathcal{A}-module. We have to show that
\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))}(\mathcal{M}, \mathcal{I}) = 0
The proof will be exactly the same as the proof of Injectives, Lemma 19.12.3.
We are going to construct by induction on the ordinal \alpha an acyclic differential graded submodule \mathcal{K}_\alpha \subset \mathcal{M} as follows. For \alpha = 0 we set \mathcal{K}_0 = 0. For \alpha > 0 we proceed as follows:
If \alpha = \beta + 1 and \mathcal{K}_\beta = \mathcal{M} then we choose \mathcal{K}_\alpha = \mathcal{K}_\beta .
If \alpha = \beta + 1 and \mathcal{K}_\beta \not= \mathcal{M} then \mathcal{M}/\mathcal{K}_\beta is a nonzero acyclic differential graded \mathcal{A}-module. We choose a differential graded \mathcal{A} submodule \mathcal{N}_\alpha \subset \mathcal{M}/\mathcal{K}_\beta isomorphic to \mathcal{M}_ s for some s \in S, see Lemma 24.25.6. Finally, we let \mathcal{K}_\alpha \subset \mathcal{M} be the inverse image of \mathcal{N}_\alpha .
If \alpha is a limit ordinal we set \mathcal{K}_\beta = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{K}_\alpha .
It is clear that \mathcal{M} = \mathcal{K}_\alpha for a suitably large ordinal \alpha . We will prove that
\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))}(\mathcal{K}_\alpha , \mathcal{I})
is zero by transfinite induction on \alpha . It holds for \alpha = 0 since \mathcal{K}_0 is zero. Suppose it holds for \beta and \alpha = \beta + 1. In case (1) of the list above the result is clear. In case (2) there is a short exact sequence
0 \to \mathcal{K}_\beta \to \mathcal{K}_\alpha \to \mathcal{N}_\alpha \to 0
By Remark 24.25.3 and since we've seen that \mathcal{I} is graded injective, we obtain an exact sequence
\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))}(\mathcal{K}_\beta , \mathcal{I}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))}(\mathcal{K}_\alpha , \mathcal{I}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))}(\mathcal{N}_\alpha , \mathcal{I})
By induction the term on the left is zero. By assumption (2) the term on the right is zero: any map \mathcal{M}_ s \to \mathcal{I} factors through \mathcal{M}'_ s and hence is homotopic to zero. Thus the middle group is zero too. Finally, suppose that \alpha is a limit ordinal. Because we also have \mathcal{K}_\alpha = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{K}_\alpha as graded \mathcal{A}-modules we see that
\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})} (\mathcal{K}_\alpha , \mathcal{I}) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{\beta < \alpha } \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})} (\mathcal{K}_\beta , \mathcal{I})
as complexes of abelian groups. The cohomology groups of these complexes compute morphisms in K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})) between shifts. The transition maps in the system of complexes are surjective by Remark 24.25.3 because \mathcal{I} is graded injective. Moreover, for a limit ordinal \beta \leq \alpha we have equality of limit and value. Thus we may apply Homology, Lemma 12.31.8 to conclude.
\square
Comments (0)