The Stacks project

Lemma 48.27.4. Let $k$, $X$, and $\omega _ X^\bullet $ be as in Lemma 48.27.1. Let $t : H^0(X, \omega _ X^\bullet ) \to k$ be as in Remark 48.27.2. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ be perfect. Then the pairings

\[ H^ i(X, \omega _ X^\bullet \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} E^\vee ) \times H^{-i}(X, E) \longrightarrow k, \quad (\xi , \eta ) \longmapsto t((1_{\omega _ X^\bullet } \otimes \epsilon )(\xi \cup \eta )) \]

are perfect for all $i$. Here $\cup $ denotes the cupproduct of Cohomology, Section 20.31 and $\epsilon : E^\vee \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} E \to \mathcal{O}_ X$ is as in Cohomology, Example 20.50.7.

Proof. By replacing $E$ with $E[-i]$ this reduces to the case $i = 0$. By Cohomology, Lemma 20.51.2 we see that the pairing is the same as the one discussed in Remark 48.27.2 whence the result by the discussion in that remark. $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 48.27: Duality for proper schemes over fields

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FVY. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.