Remark 48.32.4. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Suppose given an inverse system
of inverse systems in the category of pro-objects of \mathcal{C}. In other words, the arrows \alpha _ i are morphisms of pro-objects. By Categories, Example 4.22.6 we can represent each \alpha _ i by a pair (m_ i, a_ i) where m_ i : \mathbf{N} \to \mathbf{N} is an increasing function and a_{i, n} : M_{i, m_ i(n)} \to M_{i - 1, n} is a morphism of \mathcal{C} making the diagrams
commute. By replacing m_ i(n) by \max (n, m_ i(n)) and adjusting the morphisms a_ i(n) accordingly (as in the example referenced) we may assume that m_ i(n) \geq n. In this situation consider the inverse system
with general term
For any object N of \mathcal{C} we have
We omit the details. In other words, we see that the inverse system (M_ k) has the property
This property determines the inverse system (M_ k) up to pro-isomorphism by the discussion in Categories, Remark 4.22.7. In this way we can turn certain inverse systems in \text{Pro-}\mathcal{C} into pro-objects with countable index categories.
Comments (0)