Lemma 15.29.5. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Let $H^ q$ be the $q$th cohomology module of the extended alternation Čech complex of $M$. Then
$H^ q = 0$ if $q \not\in [0, r]$,
for $x \in H^ i$ there exists an $n \geq 1$ such that $f_ i^ n x = 0$ for $i = 1, \ldots , r$,
the support of $H^ q$ is contained in $V(f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$,
if there is an $f \in (f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$ which acts invertibly on $M$, then $H^ q = 0$.
Proof. Part (1) follows from the fact that the extended alternating Čech complex is zero in degrees $< 0$ and $> r$. To prove (2) it suffices to show that for each $i$ there exists an $n \geq 1$ such that $f_ i^ n x = 0$. To see this it suffices to show that $(H^ q)_{f_ i} = 0$. Since localization is exact, $(H^ q)_{f_ i}$ is the $q$th cohomology module of the localization of the extended alternating complex of $M$ at $f_ i$. By Lemma 15.29.3 this localization is the extended alternating Čech complex of $M_{f_ i}$ over $R_{f_ i}$ with respect to the images of $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ in $R_{f_ i}$. Thus we reduce to showing that $H^ q$ is zero if $f_ i$ is invertible, which follows from Lemma 15.29.4. Part (3) follows from the observation that $(H^ q)_{f_ i} = 0$ for all $i$ that we just proved. To see part (4) note that in this case $f$ acts invertibly on $H^ q$ and $H^ q$ is supported on $V(f)$ by (3). This forces $H^ q$ to be zero (small detail omitted). $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)
There are also: