The Stacks project

Lemma 81.4.7. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : Y' \to Y$ be a proper morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Let $i : Z \to Y$ be a closed immersion. Set $E = Z \times _ Y Y'$. Picture

\[ \xymatrix{ E \ar[d]_ g \ar[r]_ j & Y' \ar[d]^ f \\ Z \ar[r]^ i & Y } \]

If $f$ is an isomorphism over $Y \setminus Z$, then the functor

\[ \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y'_{\acute{e}tale}) \times _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (E_{\acute{e}tale})} \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Z_{\acute{e}tale}) \]

is an equivalence of categories.

Proof. Observe that $X = Y' \coprod Z \to Y$ is a proper surjective morphism. Thus it suffice to construct an equivalence of categories

\[ \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y'_{\acute{e}tale}) \times _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (E_{\acute{e}tale})} \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Z_{\acute{e}tale}) \longrightarrow \text{descent data for étale sheaves wrt }\{ X \to Y\} \]

compatible with pullback functors from $Y$ because then we can use Lemma 81.4.5 to conclude. Thus let $(\mathcal{G}', \mathcal{G}, \alpha )$ be an object of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Y'_{\acute{e}tale}) \times _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (E_{\acute{e}tale})} \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (Z_{\acute{e}tale})$ with notation as in Categories, Example 4.31.3. Then we can consider the sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ defined by taking $\mathcal{G}'$ on the summand $Y'$ and $\mathcal{G}$ on the summand $Z$. We have

\[ X \times _ Y X = Y' \times _ Y Y' \amalg Y' \times _ Y Z \amalg Z \times _ Y Y' \amalg Z \times _ Y Z = Y' \times _ Y Y' \amalg E \amalg E \amalg Z \]

The isomorphisms of the two pullbacks of $\mathcal{F}$ to this algebraic space are obvious over the summands $E$, $E$, $Z$. The interesting part of the proof is to find an isomorphism $\text{pr}_{0, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}' \to \text{pr}_{1, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}'$ over $Y' \times _ Y Y'$ satisfying the cocycle condition. However, our assumption that $Y' \to Y$ is an isomorphism over $Y \setminus Z$ implies that

\[ h : Y \coprod E \times _ Z E \longrightarrow Y' \times _ Y Y' \]

is a surjective proper morphism. (It is in fact a finite morphism as it is the disjoint union of two closed immersions.) Hence it suffices to construct an isomorphism of the pullbacks of $\text{pr}_{0, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}'$and $\text{pr}_{1, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}'$ by $h_{small}$ satisfying a certain cocycle condition. For the diagonal, it is clear how to do this. And for the pullback to $E \times _ Z E$ we use that both sheaves pull back to the pullback of $\mathcal{G}$ by the morphism $E \times _ Z E \to Z$. We omit the details. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GFY. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.