Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 7.17.8. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let \mathcal{I} \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), i \mapsto \mathcal{F}_ i be a filtered diagram of sheaves of sets. Consider the canonical map

\Psi : \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{F}_ i) \longrightarrow \Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathcal{F}_ i)

We have the following:

  1. If all the transition maps are injective then \Psi is injective.

  2. If \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) is quasi-compact, then \Psi is injective.

  3. If \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) is quasi-compact and all the transition maps are injective then \Psi is an isomorphism.

  4. Assume there exists a set S \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})) with the following properties:

    1. for every surjection \mathcal{F} \to * there exists a \mathcal{K} \in S and a map \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F} such that \mathcal{K} \to * is surjective,

    2. for \mathcal{K} \in S the product \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} is quasi-compact.

    Then \Psi is bijective.

Proof. Proof of (1). Assume all the transition maps are injective. In this case the presheaf \mathcal{F}' : V \mapsto \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathcal{F}_ i(V) is separated (see Definition 7.10.9). By Lemma 7.10.13 we have (\mathcal{F}')^\# = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i \mathcal{F}_ i. By Theorem 7.10.10 we see that \mathcal{F}' \to (\mathcal{F}')^\# is injective. This proves (1).

Proof of (2). Assume \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) is quasi-compact. Recall that \Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (*, \mathcal{F}) for all \mathcal{F} in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}). Let a_ i, b_ i : * \to \mathcal{F}_ i and for i' \geq i denote a_{i'}, b_{i'} : * \to \mathcal{F}_{i'} the composition with the transition maps of the system. Set a = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} a_{i'} and similarly for b. For i' \geq i denote

E_{i'} = \text{Equalizer}(a_{i'}, b_{i'}) \subset * \quad \text{and}\quad E = \text{Equalizer}(a, b) \subset *

By Categories, Lemma 4.19.2 we have E = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} E_{i'}. It follows that \coprod _{i' \geq i} E_{i'} \to E is a surjective map of sheaves. Hence, if E = *, i.e., if a = b, then because * is quasi-compact, we see that E_{i'} = * for some i' \geq i, and we conclude a_{i'} = b_{i'} for some i' \geq i. This proves (2).

Proof of (3). Assume \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) is quasi-compact and all transition maps are injective. Let a : * \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}_ i be a map. Then E_ i = a^{-1}(\mathcal{F}_ i) \subset * is a subsheaf and we have \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits E_ i = * (by the reference above). Hence for some i we have E_ i = * and we see that the image of a is contained in \mathcal{F}_ i as desired.

Proof of (4). Let S \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})) satisfy (4)(a), (b). Applying (4)(a) to \text{id} : * \to * we find there exists a \mathcal{K} \in S such that \mathcal{K} \to * is surjective. The maps \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{K} \to * are surjective. By (4)(b) and Lemma 7.17.5 we conclude that \mathcal{K} and \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) are quasi-compact. Thus \Psi is injective by (2). Set \mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}_ i. Let s : * \to \mathcal{F} be a global section of the colimit. Since \coprod \mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F} is surjective, we see that the projection

\coprod \nolimits _{i \in I} * \times _{s, \mathcal{F}} \mathcal{F}_ i \to *

is surjective. By (4)(a) we obtain \mathcal{K} \in S and a map \mathcal{K} \to \coprod _{i \in I} * \times _{s, \mathcal{F}} \mathcal{F}_ i with \mathcal{K} \to * surjective. Since \mathcal{K} is quasi-compact we obtain a factorization \mathcal{K} \to \coprod _{i' \in I'} * \times _{s, \mathcal{F}} \mathcal{F}_{i'} for some finite subset I' \subset I. Let i \in I be an upper bound for the finite subset I'. The transition maps define a map \coprod _{i' \in I'} \mathcal{F}_{i'} \to \mathcal{F}_ i. This in turn produces a map \mathcal{K} \to * \times _{s, \mathcal{F}} \mathcal{F}_ i. In other words, we obtain \mathcal{K} \in S with \mathcal{K} \to * surjective and a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \mathcal{K} \ar[d] \ar[r] & {*} \ar[d]^ s \\ & \mathcal{F}_ i \ar[r] & \mathcal{F} \ar@{=}[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}_ i }

Observe that the top row of this diagram is a coequalizer. Hence it suffices to show that after increasing i the two induced maps a_ i, b_ i : \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F}_ i are equal. This is done shown in the next paragraph using the exact same argument as in the proof of (2) and we urge the reader to skip the rest of the proof.

For i' \geq i denote a_{i'}, b_{i'} : \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F}_{i'} the composition of a_ i, b_ i with the transition maps of the system. Set a = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} a_{i'} : \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F} and similarly for b. We have a = b by the commutativity of the diagram above. For i' \geq i denote

E_{i'} = \text{Equalizer}(a_{i'}, b_{i'}) \subset \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} \quad \text{and}\quad E = \text{Equalizer}(a, b) \subset \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K}

By Categories, Lemma 4.19.2 we have E = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} E_{i'}. It follows that \coprod _{i' \geq i} E_{i'} \to E is a surjective map of sheaves. Since a = b we have E = \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K}. As \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} is quasi-compact by (4)(b), we see that E_{i'} = \mathcal{K} \times \mathcal{K} for some i' \geq i, and we conclude a_{i'} = b_{i'} for some i' \geq i. \square


Comments (3)

Comment #7341 by Alejandro González Nevado on

TeX typo in subindex of first coproduct in the proof (3rd paragraph).

Comment #7342 by Alejandro González Nevado on

Same TeX typo in the last coproduct of the proof (last paragraph) and in the sentence "this is done shown".


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.