Lemma 102.4.2. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $I$ be a set and for $i \in I$ let $x_ i : U_ i \to \mathcal{X}$ be an object of $\mathcal{X}$. Assume that $x_ i$ is flat and $\coprod x_ i : \coprod U_ i \to \mathcal{X}$ is surjective. Let $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ be an arrow of $\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$. Denote $\varphi _ i$ the restriction of $\varphi $ to $(U_ i)_{\acute{e}tale}$. Then $\varphi $ is injective, resp. surjective, resp. an isomorphism if and only if each $\varphi _ i$ is so.

**Proof.**
Choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective smooth morphism $x : U \to \mathcal{X}$. We may and do think of $x$ as an object of $\mathcal{X}$. This produces a presentation $\mathcal{X} = [U/R]$ for some groupoid in spaces $(U, R, s, t, c)$ and correspondingly an equivalence

See discussion in Sheaves on Stacks, Section 95.15. The structure of abelian category on the right hand is such that $\varphi $ is injective, resp. surjective, resp. an isomorphism if and only if the restriction $\varphi |_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is so, see Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 77.12.6.

For each $i$ we choose an étale covering $\{ W_{i, j} \to V \times _\mathcal {X} U_ i\} _{j \in J_ i}$ by schemes. Denote $g_{i, j} : W_{i, j} \to V$ and $h_{i, j} : W_{i, j} \to U_ i$ the obvious arrows. Each of the morphisms of schemes $g_{i, j} : W_{i, j} \to U$ is flat and they are jointly surjective. Similarly, for each fixed $i$ the morphisms of schemes $h_{i, j} : W_{i, j} \to U_ i$ are flat and jointly surjective. By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 95.12.2 the pullback by $(g_{i, j})_{small}$ of the restriction $\varphi |_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is the restriction $\varphi |_{(W_{i, j})_{\acute{e}tale}}$ and the pullback by $(h_{i, j})_{small}$ of the restriction $\varphi |_{(U_ i)_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is the restriction $\varphi |_{(W_{i, j})_{\acute{e}tale}}$. Pullback of quasi-coherent modules by a flat morphism of schemes is exact and pullback by a jointly surjective family of flat morphisms of schemes reflects injective, resp. surjective, resp. bijective maps of quasi-coherent modules (in fact this holds for all modules as we can check exactness at stalks). Thus we see

This finishes the proof. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)