Lemma 32.8.13. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 32.8.1. If
f is an immersion, and
f_0 is locally of finite type,
then f_ i is an immersion for some i \geq 0.
Lemma 32.8.13. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 32.8.1. If
f is an immersion, and
f_0 is locally of finite type,
then f_ i is an immersion for some i \geq 0.
Proof. There exists an open V \subset Y such that the morphism f factors as X \to V \to Y and such that X \to V is a closed immersion, see discussion in Schemes, Section 26.10. Since X is quasi-compact, we may and do assume V is a quasi-compact open of Y. By Lemma 32.4.11 after increasing 0 we can find a quasi-compact open V_0 \subset Y_0 such that V is the inverse image of V_0. Then the inverse image of V_0 in X_0 is a quasi-compact open whose inverse image in X is X. Hence by the same lemma applied to X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i we may assume after increasing 0 that we have the factorization X_0 \to V_0 \to Y_0. Then for large enough i \geq 0 the morphism X_ i \to V_ i where V_ i = Y_ i \times _{Y_0} V_0 is a closed immersion by Lemma 32.8.5 and the proof is complete. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: