Lemma 32.6.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ and $Y$ be schemes over $S$. Assume $Y$ is locally of finite presentation over $S$. Let $x \in X$ be a closed point such that $U = X \setminus \{ x\} \to X$ is quasi-compact. With $V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) \setminus \{ x\} $ there is a bijection

**Proof.**
Let $W \subset X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. By glueing of schemes, see Schemes, Section 26.14 the result holds if we consider pairs of morphisms $a : U \to Y$ and $c : W \to Y$ which agree over $U \cap W$. We have $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{O}_ W(W)$ where $W$ runs over the affine open neighbourhoods of $x$ in $X$. Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits W$ where $W$ runs over the affine open neighbourhoods of $s$. Thus by Proposition 32.6.1 any morphism $b : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) \to Y$ over $S$ comes from a morphism $c : W \to Y$ for some $W$ as above (and $c$ is unique up to further shrinking $W$). For every affine open $x \in W$ we see that $U \cap W$ is quasi-compact as $U \to X$ is quasi-compact. Hence $V = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits W \cap U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits W \setminus \{ x\} $ is a limit of quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes (see Lemma 32.2.2). Thus if $a$ and $b$ agree over $V$, then after shrinking $W$ we see that $a$ and $c$ agree over $U \cap W$ (by the same proposition). The lemma follows.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)