Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 21.43.12. Let \epsilon : (\mathcal{C}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\tau ) \to (\mathcal{C}_{\tau '}, \mathcal{O}_{\tau '}) be as in Section 21.27. Assume

  1. \tau ' is the chaotic topology on the category \mathcal{C},

  2. for all U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) and all K-flat complexes of \mathcal{O}(U)-modules M^\bullet the map

    M^\bullet \longrightarrow R\Gamma ((\mathcal{C}/U)_\tau , (M^\bullet \otimes _{\mathcal{O}(U)} \mathcal{O}_ U)^\# )

    is a quasi-isomorphism (see proof for an explanation).

Then \epsilon ^* and R\epsilon _* define mutually quasi-inverse equivalences between \mathit{QC}(\mathcal{O}) and the full subcategory of D(\mathcal{C}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\tau ) consisting of objects K such that R\epsilon _*K is in \mathit{QC}(\mathcal{O})1.

Proof. We will use the observations made in Section 21.27 without further mention. Since R\epsilon _* is fully faithful and \epsilon ^* \circ R\epsilon _* = \text{id}, to prove the lemma it suffices to show that for M in \mathit{QC}(\mathcal{O}) we have R\epsilon _*(\epsilon ^*M) = M. Condition (2) is exactly the condition needed to see this. Namely, we choose a K-flat complex \mathcal{M}^\bullet of \mathcal{O}-modules with flat terms representing M. Then we see that \epsilon ^*M is represented by the \tau -sheafification (\mathcal{M}^\bullet )^\# of \mathcal{M}^\bullet . Let U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}). By Leray we get

R\Gamma (U, R\epsilon _*(\epsilon ^*M)) = R\Gamma ((\mathcal{C}/U)_\tau , (\mathcal{M}^\bullet )^\# |_{\mathcal{C}/U}) = R\Gamma ((\mathcal{C}/U)_\tau , (\mathcal{M}^\bullet |_{\mathcal{C}/U})^\# )

The last equality since sheafification commutes with restriction to \mathcal{C}/U. As usual, denote \mathcal{O}_ U the restriction of \mathcal{O} to \mathcal{C}/U. Consider the map

\mathcal{M}^\bullet (U) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}(U)} \mathcal{O}_ U \longrightarrow \mathcal{M}^\bullet |_{\mathcal{C}/U}

of complexes of \mathcal{O}_ U-modules (in \tau '-topology). By our choice of \mathcal{M}^\bullet the complex \mathcal{M}^\bullet (U) is a K-flat complex of \mathcal{O}(U)-modules; see Lemma 21.18.1 and use that the inclusion of U into \mathcal{C} defines a morphism of ringed topoi (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (pt), \mathcal{O}(U)) \to (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{\tau '}), \mathcal{O}). Since M is in \mathit{QC}(\mathcal{O}) we conclude that the displayed arrow is a quasi-isomorphism. Since sheafification is exact, we see that the same remains true after sheafification. Hence

R\Gamma (U, R\epsilon _*(\epsilon ^*M)) = R\Gamma ((\mathcal{C}/U)_\tau , (M^\bullet \otimes _{\mathcal{O}(U)} \mathcal{O}_ U)^\# )

and assumption (2) tells us this is equal to R\Gamma (U, M) = \mathcal{M}^\bullet (U) as desired. \square

[1] This means that R\Gamma (V, K) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}(V)}^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}(U) \to R\Gamma (U, K) is an isomorphism for all U \to V in \mathcal{C}.

Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.