Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 20.36.1. Let (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) be a ringed space. Let f \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X). Let

\ldots \to \mathcal{F}_3 \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to \mathcal{F}_1

be inverse system of \mathcal{O}_ X-modules. Consider the conditions

  1. for all n \geq 1 the map f : \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} factors through \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_ n to give a short exact sequence 0 \to \mathcal{F}_ n \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to 0,

  2. for all n \geq 1 the map f^ n : \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} factors through \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_1 to give a short exact sequence 0 \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_ n \to 0

  3. there exists an \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{G} which is f-divisible such that \mathcal{F}_ n = \mathcal{G}[f^ n], and

  4. there exists an \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F} which is f-torsion free such that \mathcal{F}_ n = \mathcal{F}/f^ n\mathcal{F}.

Then (4) \Rightarrow (3) \Leftrightarrow (2) \Leftrightarrow (1).

Proof. We omit the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (2). We omit the proof that (3) implies (1). Given \mathcal{F}_ n as in (1) to prove (3) we set \mathcal{G} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}_ n where the maps \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to \mathcal{F}_3 \to \ldots are as in (1). The map f : \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{G} is surjective as the image of \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \subset \mathcal{G} is \mathcal{F}_ n \subset \mathcal{G} by the short exact sequence (1). Thus \mathcal{G} is an f-divisible \mathcal{O}_ X-module with \mathcal{F}_ n = \mathcal{G}[f^ n].

Assume given \mathcal{F} as in (4). The map \mathcal{F}/f^{n + 1}\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}/f^ n\mathcal{F} is always surjective with kernel the image of the map \mathcal{F}/f\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}/f^{n + 1}\mathcal{F} induced by multiplication with f^ n. To verify (2) it suffices to see that the kernel of f^ n : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}/f^{n + 1}\mathcal{F} is f\mathcal{F}. To see this it suffices to show that given sections s, t of \mathcal{F} over an open U \subset X with f^ ns = f^{n + 1}t we have s = ft. This is clear because f : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F} is injective as \mathcal{F} is f-torsion free. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.