Lemma 62.4.1. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field \kappa . Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over R. Let r \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module flat over R. Assume \dim (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_ K)) \leq r. Then \dim (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_\kappa )) \leq r and
62.4 Specialization of cycles
Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field \kappa . Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over R. Let r \geq 0. There is a specialization map
defined as follows. For an integral closed subscheme Z \subset X_ K of dimension r we denote \overline{Z} the scheme theoretic image of Z \to X. Then we let sp_{X/R} be the unique \mathbf{Z}-linear map such that
We briefly discuss why this is well defined. First, observe that the morphism X_ K \to X is quasi-compact and hence the morphism Z \to X is quasi-compact. Thus taking the scheme theoretic image of Z \to X commutes with flat base change by Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.16. In particular, base changing back to X_ K we see that Z = \overline{Z}_ K. Since Z is integral, of course \overline{Z} is integral too and in fact is equal to the unique integral closed subscheme whose generic point is the (image of the) generic point of Z. It follows from Varieties, Lemma 33.19.2 that Z_\kappa is equidimensional of dimension r.
Proof. The statement on dimension follows from More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.18.4. Let x be a generic point of an integral closed subscheme Z \subset X_\kappa of dimension r. To finish the proof we will show that the coefficient of [Z] in the left (L) and right hand side (R) of equality are the same.
Let A = \mathcal{O}_{X, x} and M = \mathcal{F}_ x. Observe that M is a finite A-module flat over R. Let \pi \in R be a uniformizer so that A/\pi A = \mathcal{O}_{X_\kappa , x}. By Chow Homology, Lemma 42.3.2 we have
where the sum is over the minimal primes \mathfrak q_ i in the support of M. Since \pi is a nonzerodivisor on M we see that \pi \not\in \mathfrak q_ i and hence these primes correspond to those generic points y_ i \in X_ K of the support of \mathcal{F}_ K which specialize to our chosen x \in X_\kappa . Thus the left hand side is the coefficient of [Z] in (L). Of course \text{length}_ A(M/\pi M) is the coefficient of [Z] in (R). This finishes the proof. \square
Lemma 62.4.2. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field \kappa . Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over R. Let r \geq 0. Let W \subset X be a closed subscheme flat over R. Assume \dim (W_ K) \leq r. Then \dim (W_\kappa ) \leq r and
Proof. Taking \mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}_ W this is a special case of Lemma 62.4.1. See Chow Homology, Lemma 42.10.3. \square
Lemma 62.4.3. Let R'/R be an extension of discrete valuation rings inducing fraction field extension K'/K and residue field extension \kappa '/\kappa (More on Algebra, Definition 15.111.1). Let X be locally of finite type over R. Denote X' = X_{R'}. Then the diagram
commutes where r \geq 0 and the vertical arrows are base change maps.
Proof. Observe that X'_{K'} = X_{K'} = X_ K \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K') and similarly for closed fibres, so that the vertical arrows indeed make sense (see Section 62.3). Now if Z \subset X_ K is an integral closed subscheme with scheme theoretic image \overline{Z} \subset X, then we see that Z_{K'} \subset X_{K'} is a closed subscheme with scheme theoretic image \overline{Z}_{R'} \subset X_{R'}. The base change of [Z] is [Z_{K'}]_ r = [\overline{Z}_{K'}]_ r by definition. We have
by Lemma 62.4.1. Since (\overline{Z}_{R'})_{\kappa '} = (\overline{Z}_\kappa )_{\kappa '} we conclude. \square
Lemma 62.4.4. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field \kappa . Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over R. Let f : X' \to X be a morphism which is locally of finite type, flat, and of relative dimension e. Then the diagram
commutes where r \geq 0 and the vertical arrows are given by flat pullback.
Proof. Let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme dominating R. By the construction of sp_{X/R} we have sp_{X/R}([Z_ K]) = [Z_\kappa ]_ r and this characterizes the specialization map. Set Z' = f^{-1}(Z) = X' \times _ X Z. Since R is a valuation ring, Z is flat over R. Hence Z' is flat over R and sp_{X'/R}([Z'_ K]_{r + e}) = [Z'_\kappa ]_{r + e} by Lemma 62.4.2. Since by Chow Homology, Lemma 42.14.4 we have f_ K^*[Z_ K] = [Z'_ K]_{r + e} and f_\kappa ^*[Z_\kappa ]_ r = [Z'_\kappa ]_{r + e} we win. \square
Lemma 62.4.5. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field \kappa . Let f : X \to Y be a proper morphism of schemes locally of finite type over R. Then the diagram
commutes where r \geq 0 and the vertical arrows are given by proper pushforward.
Proof. Let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme dominating R. By the construction of sp_{X/R} we have sp_{X/R}([Z_ K]) = [Z_\kappa ]_ r and this characterizes the specialization map. Set Z' = f(Z) \subset Y. Then Z' is an integral closed subscheme of Y dominating R. Thus sp_{Y/R}([Z'_ K]) = [Z'_\kappa ]_ r.
We can think of [Z] as an element of Z_{r + 1}(X). By definition we have f_*[Z] = 0 if \dim (Z') < r + 1 and f_*[Z] = d[Z'] if Z \to Z' is generically finite of degree d. Since proper pushforward commutes with flat pullback by Y_ K \to Y (Chow Homology, Lemma 42.15.1) we see that correspondingly f_{K, *}[Z_ K] = 0 or f_{K, *}[Z_ K] = d[Z'_ K]. Let us apply Chow Homology, Lemma 42.29.8 to the commutative diagram
We obtain that f_{\kappa , *}[Z_\kappa ]_ r = 0 or f_{\kappa , *}[Z_\kappa ] = d[Z'_\kappa ]_ r because clearly i^*[Z] = [Z_ k]_ r and j^*[Z'] = [Z'_\kappa ]_ r. Putting everything together we conclude. \square
Comments (0)