Lemma 33.8.7. A scheme $X$ over a field $k$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$ if and only if $X\times _ k X$ is irreducible.
Proof. If $X$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$, then $X\times _ k X$ is irreducible by Lemma 33.8.4.
Conversely, suppose that $X \times _ k X$ is irreducible. Replacing $X$ by the underlying reduced scheme, we can assume that $X$ is reduced without changing the problem. Since the first projection $X \times _ k X \to X$ is surjective, $X$ is also irreducible, hence integral. Suppose that there is an element $\alpha $ in the function field $k(X)$ that is separably algebraic over $k$ but not in $k$. Let $E = k(\alpha )$.
Then there is a nonempty affine open subscheme $U$ of $X$ such that $k \subset E \subset O(U)$, and so $E \otimes _ k E \subset O(U)\otimes _ k O(U) = O(U\times _ k U)$. Thus we have a dominant morphism $U \times _ k U \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(E\otimes _ k E)$. Since $X\times _ k X$ is irreducible, so is $U \times _ k U$, and hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(E \otimes _ k E)$ is connected. If $E$ is strictly bigger than $k$, then $E \otimes _ k E$ is a product of fields including $E$ as one factor. It has dimension $(\dim _ k(E))^2>\dim _ k(E)$ as a $k$-vector space, and so $E\otimes _ k E$ is a product of at least two fields, contradicting that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(E \otimes _ k E)$ is connected. So in fact $E$ is equal to $k$. By Lemma 33.8.6, $X$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)
There are also: