The Stacks project

Lemma 12.3.15. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a preadditive category, $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{A}$, and $f : x \to x$ be idempotent. Write $g = \text{id} _ x - f$ and recall by Remark 12.3.14 that $f \circ g = g \circ f = 0$.

  1. If $f$ has kernel $i : \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f) \to x$ and $p$ is the unique morphism such that $g = i \circ p$, then $p \circ i = \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f)}$ and $p$ is the cokernel of $f$.

  2. If $f$ has cokernel $p : x \to \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(f)$ and $i$ is the unique morphism such that $g = i \circ p$, then $p \circ i = \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(f)}$ and $i$ is the kernel of $f$.

  3. If $g$ has kernel $j : \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(g) \to x$ and $q$ is the unique morphism such that $f = j \circ q$, then $q \circ j = \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(g)}$ and $q$ is the cokernel of $g$.

  4. If $g$ has cokernel $q : x \to \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(g)$ and $j$ is the unique morphism such that $f = j \circ q$, then $q \circ j = \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(g)}$ and $j$ is the kernel of $g$.

Proof. As for (1), compute first that $i = (f + g) \circ i = g \circ i$. By the construction of $p$, this implies that $i \circ p \circ i = g \circ i = i \circ \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f)}$. By Lemma 12.3.11 we conclude that $p \circ i = \text{id} _{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f)}$.

It remains to show that $p : x \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f)$ satisfies the universal property of the cokernel of $f$, i.e., that given a morphism $a : x \to y$ satisfying $a \circ f = 0$ there exists a unique morphism $b : \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(f) \to y$ such that $a = b \circ p$. Existence follows by first computing that $a = a \circ (f + g) = a \circ g$ and concluding by the construction of $p$ that $a = a \circ g = a \circ i \circ p$ (so that we can take $b = a \circ i$). Uniqueness follows from that $b = b \circ p \circ i = a \circ i$ (so that $a$ determines $b$).

By duality, symmetry (i.e., that $g$ is itself idempotent; cf. Remark 12.3.14), and duality and symmetry respectively, (2), (3), and (4) follow as did (1). $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 10 comment(s) on Section 12.3: Preadditive and additive categories

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H9P. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.