Comments 1 to 20 out of 7105 in reverse chronological order.


On left comment #7613 on Section 4.2 in Categories

For the Stacks project our default kind of category has a set of objects and for every two objects a set of morphisms. But we also study some categories, such as the category of sets, where this is not the case; ideally these should all be listed in Remark 4.2.2. In particular, we make the meta-mathematical claim that the categories we use in the Stacks project whose objects and/or morphisms do not form a set can be listed. We appreciate help with this. Thanks!

On left comment #7612 on Lemma 4.24.9 in Categories

No.

On left comment #7611 on Lemma 59.69.3 in Étale Cohomology

THanks. Tried to improve here.

On left comment #7610 on Section 10.132 in Commutative Algebra

Tried to improve this a little bit. See here.

On left comment #7609 on Lemma 4.41.1 in Categories

Thanks. Fixed here.

On left comment #7608 on Lemma 10.157.6 in Commutative Algebra

We don't have to: the $0$ module has no embedded and no associated primes so (1) holds.

On left comment #7607 on Lemma 20.20.3 in Cohomology of Sheaves

Thanks for pointing out this confusing typo. Fixed here.

On left comment #7606 on Definition 8.3.1 in Stacks

Dear Hao Peng, a computer couldn't parse this definition. However, we assume the human reader has read Section 8.2 where it is explained that we use the morphisms $\alpha_{g, f}$ from Lemma 4.33.7 to identify these things. I do agree the text could be improved somewhat and I am happy to get explicit suggestions.

On left comment #7605 on Lemma 15.22.10 in More on Algebra

Yes, this is good. I'm going to leave it for now. If we every need Bezout domains we'll add this (maybe with a new tag).

On left comment #7604 on Section 14.19 in Simplicial Methods

Very good. Fixed here.

On left comment #7603 on Section 53.23 in Algebraic Curves

OK, tried to clarify. See here.

On left comment #7602 on Section 38.21 in More on Flatness

On left comment #7601 on Item 4

I know it's just like this

On left comment #7600 on Item 4

I don't understand what kind of markdown is. Is it like this

On left comment #7599 on Lemma 42.9.1 in Chow Homology and Chern Classes

Thanks, see here.

On left comment #7598 on Lemma 10.134.16 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks. Fixed here.

On left comment #7597 on Lemma 100.7.10 in Morphisms of Algebraic Stacks

Thanks. Fixed here.

On left comment #7596 on Lemma 31.22.12 in Divisors

This is now fixed by this commit.

On left comment #7595 on Lemma 17.30.5 in Sheaves of Modules

Thanks. Fixed here.

On Omri Zemer left comment #7594 on Lemma 10.110.3 in Commutative Algebra

Shouldn't the definition of the differential in the Koszul complex include $(-1)^{a+1}$ instead if the written $(-1)^{i+1}$?