The Stacks project

Comments 1 to 20 out of 4496 in reverse chronological order.

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

On left comment #4828 on Lemma 13.29.1 in Derived Categories

OMG! Thanks very much. Fixed here. I will update the website in 10 minutes...


On awllower left comment #4827 on Lemma 13.29.1 in Derived Categories

Why do the terms of belong to ?

It is the cone of a map between elements of (shifted by ), so each term is a direct sum of elements of , but is it true that direct sums of elements of also belong to ?


On awllower left comment #4826 on Lemma 36.10.3 in Derived Categories of Schemes

In it should be .


On Nicolas Müller left comment #4825 on Lemma 37.25.5 in More on Morphisms

In the first proof of Lemma 0559, after the first diagram, it should be "Note that the generic fibre of f′ is the reduction of the generic fibre of f" (instead of "geometric fibre".


On Bogdan left comment #4824 on Lemma 10.65.4 in Commutative Algebra

"or the annihilator of is '' should read "or the radical of the annihilator of is ''.


On left comment #4823 on Equation 9.7.6.1 in Fields

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4822 on Section 17.12 in Sheaves of Modules

Thanks and fixed here. If you want to be listed as a collaborator on the Stacks project, let me know your first name too.


On left comment #4821 on Lemma 28.22.2 in Properties of Schemes

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4820 on Lemma 10.136.13 in Commutative Algebra

The lemma applies to the cohomology module.


On left comment #4819 on Section 29.6 in Morphisms of Schemes

@#4734: Already fixed here.


On left comment #4818 on Lemma 33.43.4 in Varieties

Indeed. Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4817 on Lemma 10.97.1 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4816 on Lemma 26.24.1 in Schemes

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4815 on Lemma 33.28.1 in Varieties

OK, I have now finally fixed this here.


On left comment #4814 on Lemma 29.6.8 in Morphisms of Schemes

THanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4813 on Section 28.23 in Properties of Schemes

No, because is a right adjoint.


On left comment #4812 on Definition 34.5.1 in Topologies on Schemes

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #4811 on Lemma 10.135.13 in Commutative Algebra

Tried to improve the wording of these lemmas. See changes here.


On left comment #4810 on Section 107.5 in Examples

@#4720: Not sure what you mean to ask?


On left comment #4809 on Lemma 28.17.2 in Properties of Schemes

Good catch! Thanks very much. Fixed here.