## Recent comments

There are currently 2895 comments. You are now displaying comments 0 to 20 in reverse chronological order.

- On November 23 Fei Hu left comment 3007 on tag
`0CC6`In (\ref{0CC9}), the relative Frobenius morphism is defined as $F_{X/S} = (F_X, \text{id}_S)$. It lo...

- On November 21 Noah Olander left comment 3006 on tag
`08A9`I think in the proof of Lemma 32.34.13 you're using the projection formula without saying so. We kno...

- On November 21 James Waldron left comment 3005 on tag
`0C1N`In the statement of Lemma 49.15.6, I think that $f$ should be a map $f:X'\to X$ and not $f:X\to X'$....

- On November 21 James Waldron left comment 3004 on tag
`0C1M`In the statement of Lemma 49.15.5, I think that $f$ should be a map $f:X'\to X$ instead of $f:X\to X...

- On November 17 Herman Rohrbach left comment 3003 on tag
`09SE`Proof of lemma 12.3.2: First assume that $x$ is either (1) initial or (2) final. In both cases, i...

- On November 17 Herman Rohrbach left comment 3002 on tag
`09SE`Following up on the above two comments: Given a pair of objects $x,y$ in a pre-additive category ...

- On November 17 David Holmes left comment 3001 on tag
`00HY`"Since S_p is the directed limit of the rings S_f..." Here the "limit" should be "colimit" I think.

- On November 15 Dino Lorenzini left comment 3000 on tag
`09EL`In the statement of Abhyankar's lemma and the first two lines of proof, replace 3 times $(A_1)_{m_i...

- On November 14 Ariyan left comment 2999 on tag
`0C6L`Typo in first paragraph: "genus zero curve is obtain from " -> "genus zero curve is obtained from"

- On November 14 Herman Rohrbach left comment 2998 on tag
`0AMF`I want to contribute some useful examples in the spirit of the to-do list, so here is an example of ...

- On November 14 Peng Du left comment 2997 on tag
`09XD`In Lemma 15.10.11 (1), the pair (J/I, A/I) should be written as (A/I, J/I).

- On November 14 Ko Aoki left comment 2996 on tag
`0ATT`The second paragraph says "If X has a compactification over S, then X→S is separated and of finite...

- On November 12 Sandor Kovacs left comment 2995 on tag
`09SV`Another typo: in the proof of 20.13.3 "We will show that we can lift s to a sequence of G over U." ...

- On November 8 Minsik Han left comment 2994 on tag
`0BX8`$f:U\to X$ in the 4th line should be $f:U\to Y$ instead.

- On November 8 Dan Dore left comment 2993 on tag
`02LM`The numbering in the Lemma says "(\romannumeral1)", etc. instead of "(i)", etc.

- On November 8 Dario Weißmann left comment 2992 on tag
`00VK`Typo: "...which is easily see ... " should read "...which is easily seen..."

- On November 4 Peng Du left comment 2991 on tag
`0BSK`For Remark 10.150.4. line 3, "...whose residue field extension extension reproduces..."there are 2 "...

- On November 4 Wen-Wei Li left comment 2990 on tag
`03VR`In the Theorem 53.115.10: the "universal deformation ring" instead.

- On November 4 Wen-Wei Li left comment 2989 on tag
`03SL`Probably a typo in the formula before Lemma 53.86.7: the $\mathcal{F}|X_{\bar{k}}$ should be $\ma...

- On November 4 Tanya Kaushal Srivastava left comment 2988 on tag
`0CYF`(Something weird with my previous comment) Small typo in the proof second para: Let $\tilde{\xi}_n...