Recent comments
There are currently 2709 comments. You are now displaying comments 0 to 20 in reverse chronological order.
- On September 20 Jonathan Gruner left comment 2818 on tag 0DVB
Let $R$ be ring map. -> Let $R$ be a ring.
- On September 20 Pieter Belmans left comment 2817 on tag 0DP6
@2815: The difference between what you see in the source and the XyJax error is because we are repla...
- On September 20 Raymond Cheng left comment 2816 on tag 0DP6
@2815: Indeed, the diagram is broken. This appears to be an issue with XyJax. Specifically, it appea...
- On September 20 David Roberts left comment 2815 on tag 0DP6
The maths display after "Hence we can form the fibre product diagram" is broken - I get a parse erro...
- On September 20 Samir Canning left comment 2814 on tag 01HH
I think there's a missing "is an isomorphism" following $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_Y = f'^{-1}\mathcal{O}...
- On September 19 Dario Weißmann left comment 2813 on tag 00O0
Typo in the proof of (2)(a): "... for $d(f)\subset W" should read "...for $D(f) \subset W".
- On September 19 Dario Weißmann left comment 2812 on tag 00U2
In the proof of (5), we omit the last part. But this is actually (a version of) lemma 10.39.6.
- On September 19 Dario Weißmann left comment 2811 on tag 03NQ
Typo(s) in the paragraph after Definition 53.13.1: - "Given the data $\chi, \alpha, \{\chi_j\}_{i...
- On September 19 Dario Weißmann left comment 2810 on tag 03NQ
Typo(s) in the paragraph after Definition 53.13.1: - "Given the data $\chi, \alpha, \{\chi_j}_{i\...
- On September 19 Jonathan Gruner left comment 2809 on tag 02GI
PS: Especially because morphisms and polynomials can both be monic!
- On September 19 Jonathan Gruner left comment 2808 on tag 02GI
(3) is confusing because f is the name of the morphism and a polynomial.
- On September 16 BL left comment 2807 on tag 0BUM
Silly typo, in third line from the end: "and we find tat" -- "tat" should be "that."
- On September 14 Luke left comment 2806 on tag 006V
Simple typo of the word "which" in the first line.
- On September 13 Minseon Shin left comment 2805 on tag 05WQ
Suggested slogan: Henselization is compatible with quotients.
- On September 12 Saurav left comment 2804 on tag 00JM
For part 10, lemma 10.56.3 : $V_+(I) = V(I) \cap Proj(S)$. One can then use the fact that $\mathfrak...
- On September 12 Saurav left comment 2803 on tag 00JM
For part 10, lemma 10.56.3 : $V_+(I) = V(I) \cap Proj(S)$. One can then use the fact that if $\mathf...
- On September 11 Evan Warner left comment 2802 on tag 08BH
Typo: second paragraph should begin "Next, we prove the first assertion."
- On September 11 Evan Warner left comment 2801 on tag 06DX
Silly typo: "spaces" should be "space"
- On September 11 Kat Christianson left comment 2800 on tag 03GI
In the second-to-last sentence, I think the map in question is a base change of $g \circ f$, not of ...
- On September 11 Kat Christianson left comment 2799 on tag 01JD
In the last sentence of the first paragraph ("There is a morphism $f$. . ."), there seems to be a ve...