The Stacks project

Comments 1 to 20 out of 10287 in reverse chronological order.

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

On yj left comment #11252 on Lemma 47.5.6 in Dualizing Complexes

↑ sorry ?? typo? ?? (assertion (3) and l.2 in the proof)


On yj left comment #11251 on Lemma 47.5.6 in Dualizing Complexes

?? typo? ?? (assertion (3) and l.2 in the proof)


On Maximilian Schimpf left comment #11250 on Lemma 75.13.8 in Derived Categories of Spaces

In the first paragraph of the proof: Is the functor really the restriction? If so, I don't think this should be essentially surjective e.g. take affine and . You probably need to require that is an open immersion.


On Tairun Chen left comment #11249 on Lemma 10.154.1 in Commutative Algebra

should say is filtered colimit of ... instead of is ...


On left comment #11248 on Lemma 33.44.6 in Varieties

should be the product of the 's. Also Lemma 0AYU requires to be proper, so a justification should be given. For instance this is true because is the reduction of .


On left comment #11247 on Lemma 39.9.5 in Groupoid Schemes

Going to leave as is.


On left comment #11246 on Lemma 15.12.8 in More on Algebra

OK, I've changed something and we'll see if it works when I next update the website.


On left comment #11245 on Section 10.15 in Commutative Algebra

Going to leave as is.


On left comment #11244 on Theorem 29.56.1 in Morphisms of Schemes

Well, I find the text clearer than your suggestion. Maybe others can chime in?


On left comment #11243 on Lemma 29.41.8 in Morphisms of Schemes

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #11242 on Section 15.28 in More on Algebra

Thanks. Going to leave as is for now.


On left comment #11241 on Lemma 31.16.1 in Divisors

Yep. Fixed here.


On left comment #11240 on Lemma 29.34.15 in Morphisms of Schemes

Fixed.


On left comment #11239 on Section 82.11 in Chow Groups of Spaces

Fixed here.


On left comment #11238 on Lemma 26.21.16 in Schemes

Fixed.


On left comment #11237 on Lemma 59.104.2 in Étale Cohomology

Fixed.


On left comment #11236 on Lemma 28.17.1 in Properties of Schemes

Thanks for the pointer. Going to leave as is.


On left comment #11235 on Lemma 28.17.2 in Properties of Schemes

OK, I added the reference to the new EGA I. See this commit.


On left comment #11234 on Section 28.17 in Properties of Schemes

Leaving as is.


On left comment #11233 on Lemma 27.10.7 in Constructions of Schemes

Leaving as is.