The Stacks project

Comments 1 to 20 out of 9462 in reverse chronological order.

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

On left comment #10374 on Lemma 10.101.5 in Commutative Algebra

THanks! Fixed here.


On left comment #10373 on Lemma 10.134.4 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks! Fixed here.


On left comment #10372 on Remark 19.13.8 in Injectives

THanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10371 on Lemma 15.86.11 in More on Algebra

Answer: because taking cohomology is a functor. Leaving as is for now.


On left comment #10370 on Remark 15.86.10 in More on Algebra

Confusing indeed. Fixed here. Thanks!


On left comment #10369 on Lemma 10.136.12 in Commutative Algebra

We do mean the statement as it is now, but the proof was insufficient as you point out. Thanks! Fixed here.


On left comment #10368 on Section 13.3 in Derived Categories

@#9797, #9877, #9889: Going to leave as is.

@#10029. You are right about Verdier's thesis and perhaps this would have been a better convention, but other texts agree with ours. Sigh! I would like input from more people before changing this. Please chime in!


On left comment #10367 on Lemma 15.23.2 in More on Algebra

Indeed. Added this here.


On left comment #10366 on Definition 15.22.1 in More on Algebra

Thanks and fixed here.


On Yui Yuan left comment #10365 on Lemma 36.16.2 in Derived Categories of Schemes

I think you should twist finally.


On left comment #10364 on Section 15.23 in More on Algebra

This is true because the cokernel of is torsion and is torsion free.


On left comment #10363 on Lemma 59.63.5 in Étale Cohomology

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10362 on Section 27.22 in Constructions of Schemes

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10361 on Section 27.6 in Constructions of Schemes

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10360 on Lemma 58.16.4 in Fundamental Groups of Schemes

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10359 on Section 10.69 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10358 on Lemma 59.70.9 in Étale Cohomology

Thanks very much! I removed the assumption in this commit.


On left comment #10357 on Lemma 15.50.7 in More on Algebra

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10356 on Lemma 15.50.3 in More on Algebra

Thanks. Fixed here.


On left comment #10355 on Lemma 10.23.2 in Commutative Algebra

@#9784: THanks and fixed here.

@#10014: Going to leave as is.