Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 4.6.5. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let f : x \to y, and g : y \to z be representable. Then g \circ f : x \to z is representable.

Proof. Let t \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal C) and \varphi \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal C}(t,z) . As g and f are representable, we obtain commutative diagrams

\xymatrix{ y \times _ z t \ar[r]_ q \ar[d]_ p & t \ar[d]^{\varphi } \\ y \ar[r]^{g} & z } \quad \quad \xymatrix{ x \times _ y (y\! \times _ z\! t) \ar[r]_{q'} \ar[d]_{p'} & y \times _ z t \ar[d]^ p \\ x \ar[r]^ f & y }

with the universal property of Definition 4.6.1. We claim that x \times _ z t = x \times _ y (y \times _ z t) with morphisms q \circ q' : x \times _ z t \to t and p' : x \times _ z t \to x is a fibre product. First, it follows from the commutativity of the diagrams above that \varphi \circ q \circ q' = f \circ g \circ p'. To verify the universal property, let w \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal C) and suppose \alpha : w \to x and \beta : w \to y are morphisms with \varphi \circ \beta = f \circ g \circ \alpha . By definition of the fibre product, there are unique morphisms \delta and \gamma such that

\xymatrix{ w \ar[rrrd]^\beta \ar@{-->}[rrd]_\delta \ar[rrdd]_{f\circ \alpha } & & \\ & & y \times _ z t \ar[d]_ p \ar[r]_ q & t \ar[d]^{\varphi } \\ & & y \ar[r]^{g} & z }

and

\xymatrix{ w \ar[rrrd]^\delta \ar@{-->}[rrd]_\gamma \ar[rrdd]_{\alpha } & & \\ & & x \times _ y (y\! \times _ z\! t) \ar[d]_{p'} \ar[r]_{q'} & y \times _ z t \ar[d]^{p} \\ & & x \ar[r]^{f} & y }

commute. Then, \gamma makes the diagram

\xymatrix{ w \ar[rrrd]^\beta \ar@{-->}[rrd]_\gamma \ar[rrdd]_{\alpha } & & \\ & & x \times _ z t \ar[d]_{p'} \ar[r]_{q\circ q'} & t \ar[d]^{\varphi } \\ & & x \ar[r]^{g\circ f} & z }

commute. To show its uniqueness, let \gamma ' verify q\circ q'\circ \gamma ' = \beta and p'\circ \gamma ' = \alpha . Because \gamma is unique, we just need to prove that q'\circ \gamma ' = \delta and p'\circ \gamma ' = \alpha to conclude. We supposed the second equality. For the first one, we also need to use the uniqueness of delta. Notice that \delta is the only morphism verifying q\circ \delta = \beta and p\circ \delta = f\circ \alpha . We already supposed that q\circ (q'\circ \gamma ') = \beta . Furthermore, by definition of the fibre product, we know that f\circ p' = p\circ q' . Therefore:

p\circ (q'\circ \gamma ') = (p\circ q')\circ \gamma ' = (f\circ p')\circ \gamma ' = f\circ (p'\circ \gamma ') = f\circ \alpha .

Then q'\circ \gamma ' = \delta , which concludes the proof. \square


Comments (1)

Comment #9862 by Tadahiro Nakajima on

There are two typos in the proof where is .

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 4.6: Fibre products

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.