Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.25.2. Let R be a reduced ring. Then

  1. R is a subring of a product of fields,

  2. R \to \prod _{\mathfrak p\text{ minimal}} R_{\mathfrak p} is an embedding into a product of fields,

  3. \bigcup _{\mathfrak p\text{ minimal}} \mathfrak p is the set of zerodivisors of R.

Proof. By Lemma 10.25.1 each of the rings R_\mathfrak p is a field. In particular, the kernel of the ring map R \to R_\mathfrak p is \mathfrak p. By Lemma 10.17.2 we have \bigcap _{\mathfrak p} \mathfrak p = (0). Hence (2) and (1) are true. If x y = 0 and y \not= 0, then y \not\in \mathfrak p for some minimal prime \mathfrak p. Hence x \in \mathfrak p. Thus every zerodivisor of R is contained in \bigcup _{\mathfrak p\text{ minimal}} \mathfrak p. Conversely, suppose that x \in \mathfrak p for some minimal prime \mathfrak p. Then x maps to zero in R_\mathfrak p, hence there exists y \in R, y \not\in \mathfrak p such that xy = 0. In other words, x is a zerodivisor. This finishes the proof of (3) and the lemma. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 10.25: Zerodivisors and total rings of fractions

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.