Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.32.6. Let R be a ring. Let I \subset R be a locally nilpotent ideal. Then R \to R/I induces a bijection on idempotents.

First proof of Lemma 10.32.6. As I is locally nilpotent it is contained in every prime ideal. Hence \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I) = V(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R). Hence the lemma follows from Lemma 10.21.3. \square

Second proof of Lemma 10.32.6. Suppose \overline{e} \in R/I is an idempotent. We have to lift \overline{e} to an idempotent of R.

First, choose any lift f \in R of \overline{e}, and set x = f^2 - f. Then, x \in I, so x is nilpotent (since I is locally nilpotent). Let now J be the ideal of R generated by x. Then, J is nilpotent (not just locally nilpotent), since it is generated by the nilpotent x.

Now, assume that we have found a lift e \in R of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k for some k \geq 1. Let e' = e - (2e - 1)(e^2 - e) = 3e^2 - 2e^3, which is another lift of \overline{e} (since the idempotency of \overline{e} yields e^2 - e \in I). Then

(e')^2 - e' = (4e^2 - 4e - 3)(e^2 - e)^2 \in J^{2k}

by a simple computation.

We thus have started with a lift e of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k, and obtained a lift e' of \overline{e} such that (e')^2 - e' \in J^{2k}. This way we can successively improve the approximation (starting with e = f, which fits the bill for k = 1). Eventually, we reach a stage where J^ k = 0, and at that stage we have a lift e of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k = 0, that is, this e is idempotent.

We thus have seen that if \overline{e} \in R/I is any idempotent, then there exists a lift of \overline{e} which is an idempotent of R. It remains to prove that this lift is unique. Indeed, let e_1 and e_2 be two such lifts. We need to show that e_1 = e_2.

By definition of e_1 and e_2, we have e_1 \equiv e_2 \mod I, and both e_1 and e_2 are idempotent. From e_1 \equiv e_2 \mod I, we see that e_1 - e_2 \in I, so that e_1 - e_2 is nilpotent (since I is locally nilpotent). A straightforward computation (using the idempotency of e_1 and e_2) reveals that (e_1 - e_2)^3 = e_1 - e_2. Using this and induction, we obtain (e_1 - e_2)^ k = e_1 - e_2 for any positive odd integer k. Since all high enough k satisfy (e_1 - e_2)^ k = 0 (since e_1 - e_2 is nilpotent), this shows e_1 - e_2 = 0, so that e_1 = e_2, which completes our proof. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #4324 by Manuel Hoff on

In the last paragraph of the secone proof, there is the statement for any positive integer . I think this is only true for odd .

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 10.32: Locally nilpotent ideals

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.