Lemma 10.32.6. Let R be a ring. Let I \subset R be a locally nilpotent ideal. Then R \to R/I induces a bijection on idempotents.
First proof of Lemma 10.32.6. As I is locally nilpotent it is contained in every prime ideal. Hence \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I) = V(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R). Hence the lemma follows from Lemma 10.21.3. \square
Second proof of Lemma 10.32.6. Suppose \overline{e} \in R/I is an idempotent. We have to lift \overline{e} to an idempotent of R.
First, choose any lift f \in R of \overline{e}, and set x = f^2 - f. Then, x \in I, so x is nilpotent (since I is locally nilpotent). Let now J be the ideal of R generated by x. Then, J is nilpotent (not just locally nilpotent), since it is generated by the nilpotent x.
Now, assume that we have found a lift e \in R of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k for some k \geq 1. Let e' = e - (2e - 1)(e^2 - e) = 3e^2 - 2e^3, which is another lift of \overline{e} (since the idempotency of \overline{e} yields e^2 - e \in I). Then
by a simple computation.
We thus have started with a lift e of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k, and obtained a lift e' of \overline{e} such that (e')^2 - e' \in J^{2k}. This way we can successively improve the approximation (starting with e = f, which fits the bill for k = 1). Eventually, we reach a stage where J^ k = 0, and at that stage we have a lift e of \overline{e} such that e^2 - e \in J^ k = 0, that is, this e is idempotent.
We thus have seen that if \overline{e} \in R/I is any idempotent, then there exists a lift of \overline{e} which is an idempotent of R. It remains to prove that this lift is unique. Indeed, let e_1 and e_2 be two such lifts. We need to show that e_1 = e_2.
By definition of e_1 and e_2, we have e_1 \equiv e_2 \mod I, and both e_1 and e_2 are idempotent. From e_1 \equiv e_2 \mod I, we see that e_1 - e_2 \in I, so that e_1 - e_2 is nilpotent (since I is locally nilpotent). A straightforward computation (using the idempotency of e_1 and e_2) reveals that (e_1 - e_2)^3 = e_1 - e_2. Using this and induction, we obtain (e_1 - e_2)^ k = e_1 - e_2 for any positive odd integer k. Since all high enough k satisfy (e_1 - e_2)^ k = 0 (since e_1 - e_2 is nilpotent), this shows e_1 - e_2 = 0, so that e_1 = e_2, which completes our proof. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #4324 by Manuel Hoff on
Comment #4480 by Johan on
There are also: