Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.103.2. Notation and assumptions as above. If g is good with respect to (M, f_1, \ldots , f_ d), then (a) g is a nonzerodivisor on M, and (b) M/gM is Cohen-Macaulay with maximal regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_{d - 1}.

Proof. We prove the lemma by induction on d. If d = 0, then M is finite and there is no case to which the lemma applies. If d = 1, then we have to show that g : M \to M is injective. The kernel K has support \{ \mathfrak m\} because by assumption \dim \text{Supp}(M) \cap V(g) = 0. Hence K has finite length. Hence f_1 : K \to K injective implies the length of the image is the length of K, and hence f_1 K = K, which by Nakayama's Lemma 10.20.1 implies K = 0. Also, \dim \text{Supp}(M/gM) = 0 and so M/gM is Cohen-Macaulay of depth 0.

Assume d > 1. Observe that g is good for (M/f_1M, f_2, \ldots , f_ d), as is easily seen from the definition. By induction, we have that (a) g is a nonzerodivisor on M/f_1M and (b) M/(g, f_1)M is Cohen-Macaulay with maximal regular sequence f_2, \ldots , f_{d - 1}. By Lemma 10.68.4 we see that g, f_1 is an M-regular sequence. Hence g is a nonzerodivisor on M and f_1, \ldots , f_{d - 1} is an M/gM-regular sequence. \square


Comments (4)

Comment #6015 by Qilin,Yang on

It is not clear that:"The kernel has support because by assumption β€œ

Comment #6017 by Qilin,Yang on

"The kernel has support because by assumption β€œ follows from EGA IV lemme 16.2.3.1.

Comment #6169 by on

I think it is clear. The support of is contained in the support of and contained in because it is annihilated by . Then the assumption says that the dimension of is . Hence the support of (which is closed) must consist just of the maximal ideal if not empty.

If you are a random reader and you are mystified as to why we have this lemma here, please see the comment #3048 on Lemma 10.103.3.

Comment #9762 by Branislav Sobot on

Sorry, but I don't see why the case can't occur. Simply take for some ideal of definition . I think that this lemma is simply wrong in this case, while the case can't occur in the next lemma.

There are also:

  • 6 comment(s) on Section 10.103: Cohen-Macaulay modules

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.