Lemma 10.103.2. Notation and assumptions as above. If g is good with respect to (M, f_1, \ldots , f_ d), then (a) g is a nonzerodivisor on M, and (b) M/gM is Cohen-Macaulay with maximal regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_{d - 1}.
Proof. We prove the lemma by induction on d. If d = 0, then M is finite and there is no case to which the lemma applies. If d = 1, then we have to show that g : M \to M is injective. The kernel K has support \{ \mathfrak m\} because by assumption \dim \text{Supp}(M) \cap V(g) = 0. Hence K has finite length. Hence f_1 : K \to K injective implies the length of the image is the length of K, and hence f_1 K = K, which by Nakayama's Lemma 10.20.1 implies K = 0. Also, \dim \text{Supp}(M/gM) = 0 and so M/gM is Cohen-Macaulay of depth 0.
Assume d > 1. Observe that g is good for (M/f_1M, f_2, \ldots , f_ d), as is easily seen from the definition. By induction, we have that (a) g is a nonzerodivisor on M/f_1M and (b) M/(g, f_1)M is Cohen-Macaulay with maximal regular sequence f_2, \ldots , f_{d - 1}. By Lemma 10.68.4 we see that g, f_1 is an M-regular sequence. Hence g is a nonzerodivisor on M and f_1, \ldots , f_{d - 1} is an M/gM-regular sequence. \square
Comments (4)
Comment #6015 by Qilin,Yang on
Comment #6017 by Qilin,Yang on
Comment #6169 by Johan on
Comment #9762 by Branislav Sobot on
There are also: