The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

Lemma 10.113.5. Let $k$ be a field. Let $S$ be a finite type $k$-algebra. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. Let $\mathfrak p \subset S$ be a prime ideal and let $x \in X$ be the corresponding point. The following numbers are equal

  1. $\dim _ x(X)$,

  2. $\max \dim (Z)$ where the maximum is over those irreducible components $Z$ of $X$ passing through $x$, and

  3. $\min \dim (S_{\mathfrak m})$ where the minimum is over maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ with $\mathfrak p \subset \mathfrak m$.

Proof. Let $X = \bigcup _{i \in I} Z_ i$ be the decomposition of $X$ into its irreducible components. There are finitely many of them (see Lemmas 10.30.3 and 10.30.5). Let $I' = \{ i \mid x \in Z_ i\} $, and let $T = \bigcup _{i \not\in I'} Z_ i$. Then $U = X \setminus T$ is an open subset of $X$ containing the point $x$. The number (2) is $\max _{i \in I'} \dim (Z_ i)$. For any open $W \subset U$ with $x \in W$ the irreducible components of $W$ are the irreducible sets $W_ i = Z_ i \cap W$ for $i \in I'$ and $x$ is contained in each of these. Note that each $W_ i$, $i \in I'$ contains a closed point because $X$ is Jacobson, see Section 10.34. Since $W_ i \subset Z_ i$ we have $\dim (W_ i) \leq \dim (Z_ i)$. The existence of a closed point implies, via Lemma 10.113.4, that there is a chain of irreducible closed subsets of length equal to $\dim (Z_ i)$ in the open $W_ i$. Thus $\dim (W_ i) = \dim (Z_ i)$ for any $i \in I'$. Hence $\dim (W)$ is equal to the number (2). This proves that (1) $ = $ (2).

Let $\mathfrak m \supset \mathfrak p$ be any maximal ideal containing $\mathfrak p$. Let $x_0 \in X$ be the corresponding point. First of all, $x_0$ is contained in all the irreducible components $Z_ i$, $i \in I'$. Let $\mathfrak q_ i$ denote the minimal primes of $S$ corresponding to the irreducible components $Z_ i$. For each $i$ such that $x_0 \in Z_ i$ (which is equivalent to $\mathfrak m \supset \mathfrak q_ i$) we have a surjection

\[ S_{\mathfrak m} \longrightarrow S_\mathfrak m/\mathfrak q_ i S_\mathfrak m =(S/\mathfrak q_ i)_{\mathfrak m} \]

Moreover, the primes $\mathfrak q_ i S_\mathfrak m$ so obtained exhaust the minimal primes of the Noetherian local ring $S_{\mathfrak m}$, see Lemma 10.25.3. We conclude, using Lemma 10.113.4, that the dimension of $S_{\mathfrak m}$ is the maximum of the dimensions of the $Z_ i$ passing through $x_0$. To finish the proof of the lemma it suffices to show that we can choose $x_0$ such that $x_0 \in Z_ i \Rightarrow i \in I'$. Because $S$ is Jacobson (as we saw above) it is enough to show that $V(\mathfrak p) \setminus T$ (with $T$ as above) is nonempty. And this is clear since it contains the point $x$ (i.e. $\mathfrak p$). $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #712 by Keenan Kidwell on

I have two comments. First, in the third line of the proof, the union should be over instead of . Second, I don't understand how the 00OS implies that , though perhaps I'm just missing something basic about the notion of dimension. By the Jacobson-ness of , there is a closed point of in , and for such a point we have in the notation from later in the proof. But why is this ?

Comment #713 by on

OK, I fixed the index. Because we see that . The existence of a closed point implies, via Lemma 10.113.4, that there is a chain of irreducible closed of length equal to in . So . I've also added a couple of lines explaining this in this commit. Thanks!


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00OT. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.