The Stacks project

Definition 12.5.7. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an additive category. Consider a sequence of morphisms

\[ \ldots \to x \to y \to z \to \ldots \quad \text{or}\quad x_1 \to x_2 \to \ldots \to x_ n \]

in $\mathcal{A}$. We say such a sequence is a complex if the composition of any two consecutive (drawn) arrows is zero. If $\mathcal{A}$ is abelian then we say a complex of the first type above is exact at $y$ if $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(x \to y) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(y \to z)$ and we say a complex of the second kind is exact at $x_ i$ where $1 < i < n$ if $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(x_{i - 1} \to x_ i) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(x_ i \to x_{i + 1})$. We a sequence as above is exact or is an exact sequence or is an exact complex if it is a complex and exact at every object (in the first case) or exact at $x_ i$ for all $1 < i < n$ (in the second case). There are variants of these notions for sequences of the form

\[ \ldots \to x_{-3} \to x_{-2} \to x_{-1} \quad \text{and}\quad x_1 \to x_2 \to x_3 \to \ldots \]

A short exact sequence is an exact complex of the form

\[ 0 \to A \to B \to C \to 0. \]

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 7 comment(s) on Section 12.5: Abelian categories

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 010E. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.