The Stacks project

Definition 12.27.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. We say that $\mathcal{A}$ has functorial injective embeddings if there exists a functor

\[ J : \mathcal{A} \longrightarrow \text{Arrows}(\mathcal{A}) \]

such that

  1. $s \circ J = \text{id}_\mathcal {A}$,

  2. for any object $A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ the morphism $J(A)$ is injective, and

  3. for any object $A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ the object $t(J(A))$ is an injective object of $\mathcal{A}$.

We will denote such a functor by $A \mapsto (A \to J(A))$.

Comments (2)

Comment #807 by OS on

I suggest to add that should be an additive functor. (This seems to be meant judging from the later results.)

The same comment applies to the definition of "functorial projective surjections", tag 013F; otherwise module categories would have them.

(It is clear what is meant but I could not find the definition of the category .)

Comment #809 by OS on

I apologize for the previous comment. It now seems to me that many of the functorial injective embeddings constructed later on are not at all additive. So maybe it is good to mention explicitly that is not assumed to be additive...

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 12.27: Injectives

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0139. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.