The Stacks project

12.28 Projectives

Definition 12.28.1. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. An object $P \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ is called projective if for every surjection $A \rightarrow B$ and every morphism $P \to B$ there exists a morphism $P \to A$ making the following diagram commute

\[ \xymatrix{ A \ar[r] & B \\ P \ar@{-->}[u] \ar[ru] & } \]

Here is the obligatory characterization of projective objects.

Lemma 12.28.2. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $P$ be an object of $\mathcal{A}$. The following are equivalent:

  1. The object $P$ is projective.

  2. The functor $B \mapsto \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(P, B)$ is exact.

  3. Any short exact sequence

    \[ 0 \to A \to B \to P \to 0 \]

    in $\mathcal{A}$ is split.

  4. We have $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(P, A) = 0$ for all $A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Lemma 12.28.3. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Suppose $P_\omega $, $\omega \in \Omega $ is a set of projective objects of $\mathcal{A}$. If $\coprod _{\omega \in \Omega } P_\omega $ exists then it is projective.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Definition 12.28.4. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. We say $\mathcal{A}$ has enough projectives if every object $A$ has an surjective morphism $P \to A$ from an projective object $P$ onto it.

Definition 12.28.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. We say that $\mathcal{A}$ has functorial projective surjections if there exists a functor

\[ P : \mathcal{A} \longrightarrow \text{Arrows}(\mathcal{A}) \]

such that

  1. $t \circ P = \text{id}_\mathcal {A}$,

  2. for any object $A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ the morphism $P(A)$ is surjective, and

  3. for any object $A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ the object $s(P(A))$ is an projective object of $\mathcal{A}$.

We will denote such a functor by $A \mapsto (P(A) \to A)$.


Comments (2)

Comment #8547 by Max L. on

Hi! In definition 013F, the "J" should be a "P", right?


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 013A. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.